I sked the 185 and liked it. Anyone bigger will probably want the 108 anyway.
I really wish dynastar made the 108 in a185. The 182 skis really well but it would be even better a touch longer.
I sked the 185 and liked it. Anyone bigger will probably want the 108 anyway.
I really wish dynastar made the 108 in a185. The 182 skis really well but it would be even better a touch longer.
the 182 is fine, especially if you stay forward, its actual length is just under 182 which means its actual length is the same as many 184's however, if it was another two cm's longer..... I am skiing it tomorrow at +1 to see if it helps. I have a feeling it will. It is so much fun to ski, I wouldn't want to change the characteristics of what make this ski a blast.
They would already have my $ w/ a 108 @ 185.
kinda of long for those near that weight who ski tighter areas.
Thank you. I'll need to demo these skis. Having both damp and pop in the same sentence while describing a ski sounds pretty amazing.@Stev rather than compare, the all new M-Free has a wonderful damp and solid feel with good energy and pop. They correctly gave it a new name as its not like the other skis of their past.
^^^
Not a ton to talk about here yet other than the the new M-Free 99, which seems to be the ski that everyone has interest in. I will cut to the chase, it lives up to the hype, this is one fun bugger of a ski. The 185 has an 18m radius (IIRC) and is darn playful. The 98-100 "resort powder" segment is growing, and there is no doubt that the M-Free 99 will be on many skiers' short lists. The only caveat is to size up, because it skis short. The M-Pros we got on are all carryover skis -- not a bad thing, because they are also very good skis.
View attachment 124120
View attachment 124123
View attachment 124121
View attachment 124121