There will be a Cage Match come the fall for sure.Will be curious about your thoughts M-Pro 99 vs. M-Free 99.
There will be a Cage Match come the fall for sure.Will be curious about your thoughts M-Pro 99 vs. M-Free 99.
Any two stage heel will be easier to step in than a single.How are the Look SPX? As "easy" as Tyrolia Attack2 13?
Yes, a 188cm MFree 99 that was 2150g with a 20m radius would be bought instantly too!
This! I found my own sweet spot length wise exactly there and I'm only 5'9" by now.
An M Free in a length right in between the 182 and 192 would do the trick. The folks at TGR reviewed and debated the M Free extensively in the Dynastar thread and consensus there seems to be that only the 108 in the 192 length really excels whereas at 99 underfoot the M Pro is currently the better ski. They also agreed that they ski short, probably due to the extended rocker on both ends.
Dynastar seems to have stiffened up the big length over the shorter ones, can anyone confirm?
I’m 6’2”/175 and skied the 2 MFree 108 lengths back to back over a year ago in Alta. I noticed a big difference between the 182cm and 192cm MFree 108 in stability/power with the 182cm version far more playful/surfy and the 192cm version more of a playful charger.
Same thing with their Menace 98 where the longest 187cm length was much heavier and more of a charger vs the 181cm version.
Was going to buy a 192cm MFree 108 this Spring but decided to try the 2021 184cm Candide 3.0 and it honestly reminds me of the 192cm MFree 108 in a more friendly length for the tight moguls and trees I enjoy. Doesn’t ski like it’s 112mm width at all and carves insanely well.
If you’re a traditional skier, the 186cm MPro 99 is going to be more stable, damp and have better edge grip vs the 185cm MFree 99. MFree 99 looks like a riot in the trees and bumps if you’re a lighter or more playful skier though. Lots of rocker on any of these skis so they all ski shorter.
I had the 182s mounted on the recommended line and I thought they felt great there. Should I mount the 192s on the line as well? I come from a race background and like to drive the tips, but the skis will spend a good amount of time in the trees, so I still want the 192s to feel loose, tempting me to mount them a bit forward.
Love the graphic !!!!!**
** on a kitchen countertops. not so much on a ski...
I’m 6’2”/175 and skied the 2 MFree 108 lengths back to back over a year ago in Alta. I noticed a big difference between the 182cm and 192cm MFree 108 in stability/power with the 182cm version far more playful/surfy and the 192cm version more of a playful charger.
Same thing with their Menace 98 where the longest 187cm length was much heavier and more of a charger vs the 181cm version.
Was going to buy a 192cm MFree 108 this Spring but decided to try the 2021 184cm Candide 3.0 and it honestly reminds me of the 192cm MFree 108 in a more friendly length for the tight moguls and trees I enjoy. Doesn’t ski like it’s 112mm width at all and carves insanely well.
If you’re a traditional skier, the 186cm MPro 99 is going to be more stable, damp and have better edge grip vs the 185cm MFree 99. MFree 99 looks like a riot in the trees and bumps if you’re a lighter or more playful skier though. Lots of rocker on any of these skis so they all ski shorter.
I totally f'd up and missed out on Corbetts deal on the M-pro 105 earlier this summer. UGH!!
Now Im searching them out again. The Dynastar website lists the M-Pro Pro Rider(looks like the same ski). Didn't they used to be called the pro riders? Or are they calling them the pro riders again???
Anyone seeing any sweet summer deals I can try again on.
Thanks
Chris
File Not Found | BlueZone Sports
BlueZone Sports premium outdoor gear. We'll help you fuel your next adventure. Gear, clothing, footwear. Free shipping orders over $50.www.bluezonesports.com