Wow. Talk about a perfect cruiser run.
PS FWIW I did have to log in with my MS account to see that.
I'll move it...
You don't get the full quality unless you download it anyhow.
Wow. Talk about a perfect cruiser run.
PS FWIW I did have to log in with my MS account to see that.
Anyone ski both the 168 and 175 ?
Aside from the 1m posted radius increase, would the Curv GT 175 be notably stiffer / more-work than the 168 ?
There was a Fischer demo tent setup a couple days ago at my local hill ( 600' ) and I got 2 runs on the 168 as that's all the time I had -> loved it and would readily buy it if I can make some quiver room. I find my K2 STi 170 perhaps a wee bit stiff for my liking, maybe shoulda' bought it in a 165 if that length might have been a bit softer. Regardless, the Fischer seems to ooze more quality and feel and edge-grip over the K2 in my brief outing. I'm really becoming a Fischer fanboy and wish they were more readily available up here in the Toronto area. I mentioned that to the rep and he said something like "Ya, Ontario is the sales black-hole for Fischer".
That ski has no real reasons to exist. It will do exactly nothing until you ramp up the speed to where it scares you.(Heluvaskier has the 2019 182cm Curv GT and he and @razie have skied it and have had some some moments and observations of those).
So what's not to like?That ski has no real reasons to exist. It will do exactly nothing until you ramp up the speed to where it scares you.
I like to extract the fun out of the ski, energy etc. That thing is super damp , gives no feedback or energy at decent speeds and it makes you ramp up the speed into GS territory and then it suddenly does start to bend and hook up and get very lively, but you will be acutely aware of it's 16m radius.So what's not to like?
Hmmm a ski that is accessible at lower speeds is bad ... a ski that does not come to life until higher speeds is bad ... What a fickle bunch.I like to extract the fun out of the ski, energy etc. That thing is super damp , gives no feedback or energy at decent speeds and it makes you ramp up the speed into GS territory and then it suddenly does start to bend and hook up and get very lively, but you will be acutely aware of it's 16m radius.
If that happened with a 20-25m radius, it's ok, it's not all and expected, it won't hookup and scare you at speed, but this one has 16m so the risk of suddenly doing a slalom radius at GS speeds is not fun...
If you like the dampness and suspension at low speeds, I can bet it can be a nice ski. But 8f you're looking to extract the fun out if it... Uhh...
Good explanation, thanks.I like to extract the fun out of the ski, energy etc. That thing is super damp , gives no feedback or energy at decent speeds and it makes you ramp up the speed into GS territory and then it suddenly does start to bend and hook up and get very lively, but you will be acutely aware of it's 16m radius.
If that happened with a 20-25m radius, it's ok, it's not all and expected, it won't hookup and scare you at speed, but this one has 16m so the risk of suddenly doing a slalom radius at GS speeds is not fun...
If you like the dampness and suspension at low speeds, I can bet it can be a nice ski. But 8f you're looking to extract the fun out if it... Uhh...
What a fickle bunch.
I think you and Phil both have skiing styles that fit well with that ski: Calm, patient, longish turns; not afraid of speed.Long Term Update: It's been a few months since I was on the The Curv GT last but, seeing how the season has been going, I think it's the same snow! Warm afternoons and cold nights have made for some pretty firm conditions at Mt. Rose, especially early in the day. From corduroy that doesn't yield to granulated sugar on top to softening groomers as the morning wore on, the GT handles them all with no fuss. The SkiTalk GTs are tuned to 1/3 so getting on edge on the glazy stuff is no issue, and the softer stuff just becomes a place to lay tracks. It was a short morning and all runs were on groomed or kinda groomed runs except one that looked like they started and ran out of gas or time and then it froze. Everything from coral to chicken heads to death cookies with a little dirt at the bottom. I took it easy and the Fischers were unflappable. While they aren't a super demanding ski, they certainly reward a good technique while not getting too upset with mistakes.
View attachment 165076
@Philpug is less afraid of speed than me! I don't know that I'm afraid of speed, I'm just not totally confident in my ability to control it! Thank you, though. Today's snow was SO good, at least for a while, for a ski like the Curv.not afraid of speed
@Philpug is less afraid of speed than me! I don't know that I'm afraid of speed, I'm just not totally confident in my ability to control it! Thank you, though. Today's snow was SO good, at least for a while, for a ski like the Curv.
Sounds like the length was too long for you. Would a shorter be better at decent speeds?I like to extract the fun out of the ski, energy etc. That thing is super damp , gives no feedback or energy at decent speeds and it makes you ramp up the speed into GS territory and then it suddenly does start to bend and hook up and get very lively, but you will be acutely aware of it's 16m radius.
If that happened with a 20-25m radius, it's ok, it's not all unexpected, it won't hookup and scare you at speed, but this one has 16m so the risk of suddenly doing a slalom radius at GS speeds is not fun...
If you like the dampness and suspension at low speeds, I can bet it can be a nice ski. But if you're looking to extract the fun out of it... Uhh... It requires precision all of a sudden, because it starts to bend tight-ish.
I didn't spend much time on it and it was hardpack, so that likely plays into it, but that's what I got out of it.
Fair question... likely. I do not remember how long it was, as an all-mountain ski I don't suspect it was on the short side.Sounds like the length was too long for you. Would a shorter be better at decent speeds?