Probably because it didn't have Bluetooth or Apple Carplay.I think he got bored with it.
Probably because it didn't have Bluetooth or Apple Carplay.I think he got bored with it.
I didnt know landcruisers existed after 1998 in the US...
I like solid axles and I can not lie.
i have driven across most of the country in three of our 100’s over the years. Last time by myself averaging 90mph. Very comfortable. I LOVED our 80, but for our use…on the road, in the snow, a lot of highway….the 100 was a much better fit.
Toyota is on record as stating that eventually every model that they sell will have a hybrid version. I don't expect Toyota to do much with full EVs until a light weight, smaller solid state or other battery technology is available.Here's my prediction/hope for the next US Land Cruiser: an EV off-roader along the lines of the Hummer EV, but with a generator under the hood.
Very true with Toyota's mass-market vehicles. Given their scale, they have said they can better utilize constrained battery production capacity by selling hybrids instead of EVs. A hybrid only needs a fraction of the battery of an EV, so the overall impact is larger by producing hybrids vs. EVs.Toyota is on record as stating that eventually every model that they sell will have a hybrid version. I don't expect Toyota to do much with full EVs until a light weight, smaller solid state or other battery technology is available.
If it has a diesel/gas-electric propulsion then it is a hybrid, not a battery EV. Toyota has 20+ years of gas-electric hybrid drive trains experience so that is what they will go with, not a new technology for a low production SUV like the Landcruiser.But, the Land Cruiser isn't a mass-production. Especially if it's a high-end overland diesel/gas-electric vehicle, they could sell it in small quantities north of $100K like the Hummer EV.
The big question for me what's the next US Land Cruiser?
I can't see Toyota not using the Land Cruiser brand equity on a new vehicle, especially how hot the big SUV and the off-road markets are these days. That would be business malpractice. How long is the only question? 2024? 2025?
Here's my prediction/hope for the next US Land Cruiser: an EV off-roader along the lines of the Hummer EV, but with a generator under the hood.
The gas/diesel generator will charge the batteries when there's no plug or can operate continuously while driving in a gas/diesel-electric mode, making it an extraordinarily efficient overland vehicle. As a bonus feature, the generator can power your house when the grid goes down!
I'm in the camp of DNW a turbo motor for a full sized truck. I know modern turbos are far more reliable than in the past but it just adds a bunch of extra parts that take a beating and can and will eventually fail.Toyota announced the new Tundra yesterday. First complete redesign since 2007!
This great article makes a case for it being our new LC:
The New 2022 Tundra is North America’s New Land Cruiser - Expedition Portal
Editor’s Note: We have received a specification update from Toyota indicating that the payload of the TRD PRO variant will be 1,600 pounds, not the 1455 indicated on the door sticker shown below. This is exciting news, seeing this significant increase in the available capacity of such a capable...expeditionportal.com
With the Tundra (and Sequoia next year) built on the same platform as the global LC, it's making more sense why Toyota isn't marketing a Land Cruiser version. Why pay more for a substantially similar vehicle.
I'm super excited to get the LC reliability at a lower cost and with wide availability. Of course, the 300 series LC will be available as a next-generation LX if you are ok with the luxury brand and trim.
I've been leery of the new V6 turbo being the only engine option going forward (as the owner of Toyota 4.6, 4.7, and 5.8L V8's!). Given it's one of the global LC engines, here's hoping it's engineered to be another million-mile engine in spite of the turbo.
My '93 MR2 turbo has 219k kms and is a low pressure turbo delivering about 7-8 psi at full boost. I suspect a twin turbo V6 from Toyota will also be low pressure.I'm in the camp of DNW a turbo motor for a full sized truck. I know modern turbos are far more reliable than in the past but it just adds a bunch of extra parts that take a beating and can and will eventually fail.
I've had two plus the one I have now. The 2006 my son is driving now has almost 200,000 miles on it with no turbo issues. Sold the '97 to get the 2006 when it had 125K, no problems. I think they (and GM and Ford) had problems in the 08-09 timeframe when more emissions came into play but that's been all ironed out as far as I know. And those turbos are running in the mid to upper teens as far as pressure goes.I also own a Cummins turbo diesel truck
I've always avoided turbos, as I tend to keep my vehicles around. I still have my 2000 Tundra I bought new when it first came out. It's been super reliable despite being the first model year. It's only two generations old 22 years later.I'm in the camp of DNW a turbo motor for a full sized truck. I know modern turbos are far more reliable than in the past but it just adds a bunch of extra parts that take a beating and can and will eventually fail.
Further: I suspect that the Twin Turbo Tundra will be a lot more powerful than the V8 it replaces and get better fuel economy.
And the tires cost more. Less rubber, more money, worse ride. On a performance vehicle, yes, they make sense. On a highway cruiser? Not so much. I'll slow down on the curves to get a better ride. I have a feeling the Ascent will be on the shortlist when we get around to getting @AKMINK a new ride.My only critique is 20“ wheels are stupid