Are DIN numbers based on a spec or a standard? Is a 10 DIN on any binding the same as opposed to the 130 boot flex numbers from brand to brand?Numbers? We don't need no stinking numbers!!
Are DIN numbers based on a spec or a standard? Is a 10 DIN on any binding the same as opposed to the 130 boot flex numbers from brand to brand?Numbers? We don't need no stinking numbers!!
Are DIN numbers based on a spec or a standard? Is a 10 DIN on any binding the same as opposed to the 130 boot flex numbers from brand to brand?
Tecnically they are not DIN but ISO standards but yes, in a bench test, 10 is 10 is a 10. I was told this at one point, be it accurate or not but supposed testing with done that the forces that a male racer puts on a binding equates to around what a 14 would be. True or not, I cannot confirm but it came from someone extremely knowledgeable about bindings.Are DIN numbers based on a spec or a standard? Is a 10 DIN on any binding the same as opposed to the 130 boot flex numbers from brand to brand?
Ah, the green spring 727s. I had a couple of pairs of them that came from a buddy on the British team. i can remember the Salomon rep being horrified and that I might die using them….Numbers? We don't need no stinking numbers!!
View attachment 168557
Ha, this reminds me of a test centre that set my bindings at 8 by drawing an extra line below the 10 on a PX 18.Numbers? We don't need no stinking numbers!!
Right, that is why I need higher DIN, I am a choppier skier...those guys are better and smoother and can get away with lower DIN. The binding doesn't know the talent of the skier, it only feels forces and reacts accordingly.I'm sure that "hard easy coast snow" and Sunday racers are special, but guys on WC, at similar weight, and with just slightly more aggressive skiing at just slightly higher speed (I doubt many sunday racers bomb down tracks similar to Kitz at 150+km/h), and on ice that most likely is nothing compared to "hard east coast snow" have bindings set to less on their race skis
I know and absolutely agree forces in recreational racing are way higher then on WC.Right, that is why I need higher DIN, I am a choppier skier...those guys are better and smoother and can get away with lower DIN. The binding doesn't know the talent of the skier, it only feels forces and reacts accordingly.
Still have the green spring 727 on my Roc comp that i got from James Major back in 1976Ah, the green spring 727s. I had a couple of pairs of them that came from a buddy on the British team. i can remember the Salomon rep being horrified and that I might die using them….
That is just nuts. I've seen the delam in race videos. Just crazy amount of force I guess.A downhill ski exploding
Mine are set at 7. I'm thin and not that heavy. Have never felt the binding was going to release. Maybe I need to apply more force in the turns!On my race skis I generally have DIN set at ~16-18, at that point, popping up another few clicks is grey vs gray.
FWIW, I am 6'1, ~185, then throw in all the gear and my bindings feel ~200+ lb worth of skier knocking them into hard, east coast snow.
One of the great stories in racing-When I asked about them I learned that they had been attached to Chad Fleischer when he crashed off the finish jump at Kitzbuhel.
"That's when I ripped my knee apart and shoved my femur up into my hip..."One of the great stories in racing-
“I knew I was going to win the race.”
He has what looks like 997's on the skis, the highest I have seen these were 14-20's. Correct?One of the great stories in racing-
“I knew I was going to win the race.”
I’d say if they went out there with screwguns, it was to get him out of the binding. How are you going to get the binding off an injured leg with no ski attached?
I've walked out of a Salomon heel set at 15.5, on a 9-16 binding.Right, that is why I need higher DIN, I am a choppier skier...those guys are better and smoother and can get away with lower DIN. The binding doesn't know the talent of the skier, it only feels forces and reacts accordingly.