• For more information on how to avoid pop-up ads and still support SkiTalk click HERE.

Avalanche Fatality - Berthoud Pass should become a ski area again

Status
Not open for further replies.

tball

Unzipped
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
4,368
Location
Denver, CO
CAIC Report


Sadly this death was entirely foreseeable and preventable.

This victim would still be alive If the Forest Service bureaucrats were not determined there shouldn't be a ski area on Berthoud Pass and shut down the area that had been around for more than sixty years. It's just a matter of time until there is another avalanche fatality on Berthoud Pass. :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ken_R

Living the Dream
Skier
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Posts
5,775
Location
Denver, CO
Everyone can see those steeps from the road so the temptation is always there. Even basic knowledge will inform you to not ski there until conditions are right. Low hanging fruit claims a life. Sorry for all those involved.

That said Berthoud Pass is an amazing area that is easy to access and ski safely almost any day of the season.

Another ski area would be cool but people will still venture outside any boundary and be at risk if they lack the knowledge and prudence to do things right. The Colorado snowpack will always be sketchy most days. It is what it is.
 

jmeb

Enjoys skiing.
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
4,495
Location
Colorado
For those who may not have a deep history of this extremely popular backcountry ski area:

This is the first avalanche fatality within the boundaries of the old ski area since 2011.

It is the second fatality within the boundaries of the old ski area since it shuttered due to financial difficulties in 2001.

"Berthoud Pass" is used to refer to the pass itself, the old ski area terrain, and the several drainages stretching from Stanley mountain to the south to First Creek in the north, on both sides of the pass. It includes over a hundred slide paths and many more pockets of avalanche terrain capable of producing deadly avalanches.

Vibes to the families and communities impacted by this tragic accident.
 

crgildart

Gravity Slave
Skier
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
16,450
Location
The Bull City
I blame the ski stoke videos that show extreme skiers skiing stuff so steep and deep it's right on the verge of busting loose.. sometimes busting loose right behind them. When the ultimate prize is right on the edge of disaster, folks are going to die chasing it.

And ya, in plain sight and too easy to get to maybe they either staff it again for $$$s or make it somehow unskiable the way cities put up barriers and obstacles to deter skateboarders.
 

dbostedo

Asst. Gathermeister
Moderator
Contributor
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Posts
18,328
Location
75% Virginia, 25% Colorado
CAIC Report


Sadly this death was entirely foreseeable and preventable.

This victim would still be alive If the Forest Service bureaucrats were not determined there shouldn't be a ski area on Berthoud Pass and shut down the area that had been around for more than sixty years. It's just a matter of time until there is another avalanche fatality on Berthoud Pass. :(
Isn't this kind of like saying every easily accessed avalanche area should be mitigated? Why is this one area special (other than it used to be a ski area)?
 

pais alto

me encanta el país alto
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 11, 2015
Posts
1,980
Location
Has anyone proposed (re)opening a ski area at BP, but the FS ‘bureaucrats’ turned them down?

Also;
The ski resort was closed in 2002 due to financial problems caused by lack of water and sewage at the top of the pass.

Maybe you should go for it @tball. I’d go and be on the first chair.
 
Last edited:

Tony S

I have a confusion to make ...
Skier
Team Gathermeister
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Posts
12,880
Location
Maine
Isn't this kind of like saying every easily accessed avalanche area should be mitigated? Why is this one area special (other than it used to be a ski area)?
I had this question too.
 
Thread Starter
TS
tball

tball

Unzipped
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
4,368
Location
Denver, CO
This is the first avalanche fatality within the boundaries of the old ski area since 2011.

It is the second fatality within the boundaries of the old ski area since it shuttered due to financial difficulties in 2001.
Given the relatively small number of users of Berthoud Pass, is a fatality per decade acceptable in terms of public safety?
 
Thread Starter
TS
tball

tball

Unzipped
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
4,368
Location
Denver, CO
Isn't this kind of like saying every easily accessed avalanche area should be mitigated? Why is this one area special (other than it used to be a ski area)?
Big picture, my feeling is both Berthoud Pass and Loveland Pass should be brought inbounds. From a public safety perspective, they are too easy to access and too close to millions of people on the front range. People will continue to die on both passes if something doesn't change.

This case is particularly troubling, as I probably skied the chute where the snowboarder died more than a hundred times when it was mitigated as part of the ski area. The chute is right under where the west side lift was and one of only a handful of good shots you could lap from the lift.

The Forest Service tore down a perfectly good quad lift that was a little more than ten years old. The lift was immediately above where the snowboarder died.
 
Last edited:
Thread Starter
TS
tball

tball

Unzipped
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
4,368
Location
Denver, CO
Nitro Chute, where the snowboarder died Monday, is #39 on this 1998 ski area map:

Monosnap 1359337157.jpg (2560×3508) 2022-12-28 18-18-33.jpg

Source: https://skimap.org/SkiAreas/view/2669/downhill

My link to the CAIC report is broken in the OP. This should work:
 

wooglin

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Posts
1,487
Location
Center of the Civilized World
Play stupid games win stupid prizes? Someone died in the Whites again this week because they were dumb. It happens. I feel bad for them and especially for their families, but it happens.
 
Thread Starter
TS
tball

tball

Unzipped
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
4,368
Location
Denver, CO
Small number of users? The SOB moguls up in numerous places. You can see ‘em from the highway!
Yes, small relative to the millions of visits to ski areas!

For those not familiar, Berthoud Pass is parking constrained, and this is the current size of the parking lot (plus a few spots in designated areas along the highway):

1672290871650.png
 

CascadeConcrete

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Posts
333
Location
Seattle
This victim would still be alive If the Forest Service bureaucrats were not determined there shouldn't be a ski area on Berthoud Pass
I don't think I buy that premise. Backcountry skiers are skiing Berthoud because it's a convenient backcountry access location, not simply because it is Berthoud Pass. Putting a ski resort there would only lead to those same skiers going somewhere else. At risk of stating the obvious, a ski resort isn't the backcountry.
 
Thread Starter
TS
tball

tball

Unzipped
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
4,368
Location
Denver, CO
Putting a ski resort there would only lead to those same skiers going somewhere else.
Not necessarily.

The extreme ease of access to Berthoud and Loveland Passes lures many into dangerous backcountry terrain who would likely never go somewhere more difficult to access.
 

Primoz

Skiing the powder
Skier
Joined
Nov 8, 2016
Posts
2,495
Location
Slovenia, Europe
Big picture, my feeling is both Berthoud Pass and Loveland Pass should be brought inbounds. From a public safety perspective, they are too easy to access and too close to millions of people on the front range. People will continue to die on both passes if something doesn't change.

This case is particularly troubling, as I probably skied the chute where the snowboarder died more than a hundred times when it was mitigated as part of the ski area. The chute is right under where the west side lift was and one of only a handful of good shots you could lap from the lift.

The Forest Service tore down a perfectly good quad lift that was a little more than ten years old. The lift was immediately above where the snowboarder died.
I admit I have different mentality, as I'm living on the other side of ocean all my life, but at least for me, I really don't get your argument here. Over here, you are responsible for your actions, and if you do stupid thing it's up to you. Going out in backcountry, regardless on this how easy accesible it is, is your own responsibility, and it's up to you to check conditions. It's also up to you if you screw up. I don't really get this idea that every possible terrain where avalanches can happen should be monitored and mitigated, so stupid people who don't bother to check and learn anything, can use it freely (and can sue someone when something bad happens).
We have sort of similar place, just without lift, in my backyard.... 15min skimo and you are in middle of real alpine terrain, with all dangers from avi danger, to steep walls and cliffs. And yes, there's plenty of people who take it easy because "it's just 15min from car so it can't be that bad", but still if you go there do stupid things it's your own responsibility, and luckily there's no ideas from any side, that this should be changed and some restrictions should be implemented. Well luckily there's no option even in our constitution, that would prevent anyone have free access to that terrain :)
 

mikel

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Jul 3, 2016
Posts
1,895
I don't think I buy that premise. Backcountry skiers are skiing Berthoud because it's a convenient backcountry access location, not simply because it is Berthoud Pass. Putting a ski resort there would only lead to those same skiers going somewhere else. At risk of stating the obvious, a ski resort isn't the backcountry.

People do backcountry all along the road from there to Mary Jane. You're right about Berthoud because of easy access and more places to park but there are some that still go there because it's Berthoud.
 

pais alto

me encanta el país alto
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 11, 2015
Posts
1,980
Location
Big picture, my feeling is both Berthoud Pass and Loveland Pass should be brought inbounds. From a public safety perspective, they are too easy to access and too close to millions of people on the front range. People will continue to die on both passes if something doesn't change.

[…]

The Forest Service tore down a perfectly good quad lift that was a little more than ten years old. The lift was immediately above where the snowboarder died.
Doubling down there? I posted above:
The ski resort was closed in 2002 due to financial problems caused by lack of water and sewage at the top of the pass.

Is Wikipedia wrong? We can correct it if that’s the case.

Or if you just hate the FS and really want BP as a ski area, then…we can just keep that in mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Sponsor

Staff online

Top