@greentrees,
Height, weight (270#), BSL and Skier Type (presumably III, or III+) are needed to know what your DIN should be set to. It is
not necessary to be in the middle of the DIN range of a binding for best performance, but it isn't bad, either. Higher DIN bindings tend to have more metal parts making them a bit more durable (a plus) and heavier (could be good or bad depending on your desires).
Bad experiences with older plastic bindings is throwing a false shadow onto current plastic bindings. Current all-plastic bindings are fine, old plastic bindings are prone to break/crack/fall apart due to the age of the plastic; current plastic is light years ahead of plastic from 20, 30 and 40 years ago.
Weight of the binding is a factor in how a binding will affect your skiing. Less weight means you can adjust the position of your skis with less effort, especially when you are light on your ski or airborne. Weight isn't a penalty for carving as the ski's design/sidecut is controlling where your ski is going.
Stack height, the height of the binding (and plate if present) from the topsheet, and delta, the difference between toe height and heel height, are much more significant factors to differences in performance than the binding itself. They directly affect your stance and balance on the ski.
A direct connection between the toe and heel piece will affect how the ski works as well as how the binding functions. A connection between toe and heel usually means you have less influence from the binding affecting the flex of the ski AND it is better at dealing with maintaining proper forward pressure during extreme flexing and rebound of a ski. ('rebound' is the opposite of flexion; it is what happens to the ski when the forces flexing the ski are removed. It rebounds past neutral (unloaded) camber.)
Many, if not most, park riders prefer Look Pivots as they provide a great deal of elasticity at the heel and absorb excessive flex and rebound well. In general, any higher or high end binding is going to have excellent performance with regards to retention, both from forces in a fall
and from ski flexion and rebound.
Demo bindings generally longer plates to accommodate more range of boot sole lengths. These plates can affect the flex of a ski to some degree. They also tend to have a taller stack height than plain bindings alone. It is going to be a pretty sensitive skier that would notice a difference between a demo and a retail version of a binding, especially in 'steeps/trees/bumps in CO'.
So many of these factors are personal preference: weight, metal v plastic, DIN setting relative to the range of DIN settings. Some are more objective: affect on flex pattern, maintaining forward pressure, elasticity.
The Protector (edit: I originally wrote 'Progressor') and the Knee Binding are the only bindings that support true lateral release at the heel. It isn't marketing hype. Their retention/release performance may not be ideal but it is a step in the right direction for protecting knees.