Curious to hear your thoughts on both skis, and why you preferred the M6.
*My Opinion*
The M6 in a 177 is plenty of ski for me. It was as solid at 45-50 mph GS turns on a high edge, then they were perfectly happy to tighten it up when I rolled to a steeper face section. Point and shoot and I loved the weight. Took them to some windblown chop, soft moguls, firm snow most in the west would call icy conditions and they didn't miss a beat. I'm sure a 184 would have been fun, but that's not the point with these skis for me.
The Kendo's were just less of everything. I know what I e read and heard - it's the same ski minus some width and some adjustments to radius but for me.... It's just not. They felt like a toy next to the M6. I don't know how else to put it. Probably easier to initiate and they ski much shorter but initiation isnt a problem for me. I didn't trust them as much as the M6.
There is absolutely a scenario where this would be all I NEED, but I'm fortunate enough to have a choice.
I'm a pretty decent skier and know how to bend a ski pretty well. I can't outski the M6.
And I got them with some Markers for 30% off, but don't tell anyone ;-)
I really appreciate everyone's input. Happy to answer any questions to the best of my ability