I got interested today in a theme that seems to be popping up in a lot of threads about the "Ikon/Epic" effect. Lots o' complaining about "how crowded" slopes are.
So I found this sheet on the National Ski Area Association website. http://www.nsaa.org/media/303945/visits.pdf
What it reports is, yes, last year in particular showed a big uptick in skier visits, with 2018-19 ranking #4 in visits since 1978-79. But equally interesting was the ranking of the last seven years previous: 24, 14, 25, 22, 12,10, 32. What this suggests to me is that our perception of how crowded things are is accurate...but also heavily influenced by our recent memories of years with far fewer visits. So I guess we have a right to complain, but we are also doing so in an era of generally declining skier visits. As has been raised in the 2019-2020 Northeast thread, do we see the glass as half-empty or half-full?
So I found this sheet on the National Ski Area Association website. http://www.nsaa.org/media/303945/visits.pdf
What it reports is, yes, last year in particular showed a big uptick in skier visits, with 2018-19 ranking #4 in visits since 1978-79. But equally interesting was the ranking of the last seven years previous: 24, 14, 25, 22, 12,10, 32. What this suggests to me is that our perception of how crowded things are is accurate...but also heavily influenced by our recent memories of years with far fewer visits. So I guess we have a right to complain, but we are also doing so in an era of generally declining skier visits. As has been raised in the 2019-2020 Northeast thread, do we see the glass as half-empty or half-full?