It's not "too expensive" per se... but it's not worth the extra cost to them, to maximize profit.Or is it too expensive for ski manufacturers to use wax with fluoro?
Tried to google but couldn't find any result.
I'm talking about the wax from new skis bought off the retail shop floor or online.
Is factory wax actually a thing?
With fluoros, I’m just going to say no. With no knowledge. Especially now after fluoros sre being banned. It’s not the amount on one ski, it’s buying in bulk and having it airborne in the factory. Just no point to pay more for more risk and no benefit. When’s the last time a review mentioned factory wax?Is factory wax actually a thing?
That's because the typical buyer of a high end nordic model cares a LOT about how efficient his or her skis are, and can tell right off if they're fast or not. When your glide comes from muscle, not gravity, good wax is not a "nice to have."Actually some of Fischer race service xc skis come out of factory with several fluoro wax cycles in them (until now, but god knows what will be after FIS and IBU announced (partial) fluoro ban to be effective already in 2021/22 season). For normal store skis, I doubt they come with any waxing at all, even less with fluoro.
I'm just saying wax can be a selling aid.But wouldn’t grind matter more?
Grind is very important. Many nordic tuning shops don't do alpine skis so as not to contaminate the emulsion with metal debris.But wouldn’t grind matter more?