- Joined
- May 2, 2017
- Posts
- 4,347
When i looked those up i got some ahem interesting results. I think you are correct.Heart monitor or electrostim? 'Coz stim concurrent with other exercise is totally a hyper-fitness thing now.
When i looked those up i got some ahem interesting results. I think you are correct.Heart monitor or electrostim? 'Coz stim concurrent with other exercise is totally a hyper-fitness thing now.
I bet the kid had a 325 BSL so he could grow into his boots too.Ok…so, at the shop today….I had an install of an M5 Mantra (177). The ski was purchased online from Evo, so I was just installing bindings (Marker Griffons)(also purchased from Evo )….As I was preparing for the install….getting everything set/paperwork….I notice the customer is a 5’4 120 lb. 13yo Type II skier?….
So, I stand over this ridiculous install and wonder if I should call the customer/parents and tell him/them this is probably not the appropriate ski for him?? (He’ll have trouble carrying the thing in the parking lot, let alone actually trying to ski it/turn it)……I did install it, but did not feel good about it.
The stuff that comes in from online purchases is of course more common….sometimes it’s awesome/unique to NEPA…more often than not it’s a young kid just liking the top sheet/colors….
Or parents buying their kids equipment to "grow in to"more often than not it’s a young kid just liking the top sheet/colors….
Or parents buying their kids equipment to "grow in to"
My 5'4" 120 lb 14 year old got his Kids Nordica Enforcer 95's 150cm with Attack 11's last year and will use them again this year. He skis everything including steep trees at Killington/Pico. I, a 46 year old 5'7" 175 lb muscular man would use a Mantra M5 177 with Marker Griffons. That would be a "Charger" ski for me; and I'm a very good skier. My 17 year old is 5'11" 135 lbs. and uses a JSkis Allplay 171 cm w/ Look 14's. He's also a very good skier. This type 2 little kid on the Mantra gonna die! I take no pleasure in this; but that kid is on the wrong s#!t. How will this little kid bend a Mantra M5 177? If my 17 year old wasn't a skinny bean pole, I would have bought a 178 for him at 5'11", and the Allplay is a soft, playful ski.Ok…so, at the shop today….I had an install of an M5 Mantra (177) and Marker Griffons. The skis and bindings were purchased online from Evo. As I was preparing for the install….getting everything set/paperwork….I notice the customer is a 5’4 120 lb. 13yo Type II skier?….
My daughter, 34, is still wearing sox I bought her when she was eight or nine.That reminds me of the time my dad took me shopping for a new winter jacket. I think I was 13 years old circa 1971. I'm pretty sure it was at Sears. Anyway, I found a jacket I liked and showed it to him. He said great and hung it back on the rack then grabbed one two sizes larger. I told him it was way too big and he responded that it wouldn't be in a couple of years. I wore that jacket for 4-5 years!
And sometimes it is driven by the kids wanting a big fat ski. A good friend wanted to get his tiny 13 year old daughter new skis so she would be more excited and ski with him more often. He let her choose and she ended up with a pair of Mindbender 106C skis that were easily a foot taller than she was. He asked me what I thought of the skis for her and I told him the truth, way to long and way to fat for a little kid, his response was I think she can handle them and the extra length means they are good for a few years ... fast forward to when we finally skied with him in April and the skis were so big his poor daughter could barely turn on technical terrain and essentially side slipped anything steep.Ok…so, at the shop today….I had an install of an M5 Mantra (177) and Marker Griffons. The skis and bindings were purchased online from Evo. As I was preparing for the install….getting everything set/paperwork….I notice the customer is a 5’4 120 lb. 13yo Type II skier?….
So, I stand over this ridiculous install and wonder if I should call the customer/parents and tell him/them this is probably not the appropriate ski for him?? (He’ll have trouble carrying the thing in the parking lot, let alone actually trying to ski it/turn it)……I did install it, but did not feel good about it.
The stuff that comes in from online purchases is of course more common….sometimes it’s awesome/unique to NEPA…more often than not it’s a young kid just liking the top sheet/colors….
My 5'4" 120 lb 14 year old got his Kids Nordica Enforcer 95's 150cm with Attack 11's last year and will use them again this year. He skis everything including steep trees at Killington/Pico. I, a 46 year old 5'7" 175 lb muscular man would use a Mantra M5 177 with Marker Griffons. That would be a "Charger" ski for me; and I'm a very good skier. My 17 year old is 5'11" 135 lbs. and uses a JSkis Allplay 171 cm w/ Look 14's. He's also a very good skier. This type 2 little kid on the Mantra gonna die! I take no pleasure in this; but that kid is on the wrong s#!t. How will this little kid bend a Mantra M5 177? If my 17 year old wasn't a skinny bean pole, I would have bought a 178 for him at 5'11", and the Allplay is a soft, playful ski.
'
Sssh, they're really for Dad. Don't tell Mom.As I’m drilling through all that metal...I’m saying to myself, how the hell is this 6th grade kid gonna carry these missiles/ let alone turn them......and with big ol’ heavy Griffons.....I’m hoping the family sees on the first day these are too much.....this package will sell very easily to an adult skier.
While I do appreciate the convenience of seasonal rentals, this is a point on which we have to agree to disagree. I have a lot of issues with seasonal rentals and it breaks down like this:If you have a budget that allows you to consider ski shop wall gear instead of used/swap meet gear but are concerned about kids growing out of the gear here's what you do.. Go with seasonal rentals instead of purchasing new gear. If they grow out of something you can then trade up in size under the terms of most of those agreements.
As for the other typical "wrong gear" gripes. Your skis are too fat/skinny/soft/hard/long/short for conditions. Unless you're competing who cares.. If you like your skis and can ski them well enough for your level of stoke then who cares what anyone else says..
Blame the shop and it's employees... I've found that most consumers ignore the advice of the shop/employees and just buy the latest hype machine that is being promoted on the interweb. Our local hills are in a relatively low snow area, with few powder days, and most skiers would be best served with a low 80's waist, firm snow oriented model. However, they won't even consider that category. It has to be over 100mm and rockered like crazy. Can you ski predominately firm and/or groomed conditions with that category of skis? Yes, but it's a lot of work and not that fun (imho). They won't be caught dead skiing on a "carving" ski. We give them the "talk" and try to make a case for "narrowish", firmer-snow oriented, ski models. For the most part, we are summarily ignored. So, to stay in business, we sell them what they want. You want to look for someone to blame, then focus on TGR, Matchstick, Warren Miller and the marketing departments who capitalize on that image.I am really glad we raised this point--because I want to raise another reason why people are on the wrong skis--and that is poorly trained ski shop employees who are selling the hype themselves. I'm not just referring to city shops; elite mountain shops too. I know if you're lucking enough to buy a ski from Phil Schaffner or Tricia--you'll get really good advice. But I've personally witnessed, on more than one occasion, ski shop sales people pushing skis to people that are clearly above their skill envelope--even as the customer was actively trying to tamp down their needs and skills. I believe some shop employees instinctively tend to push the skis they'd love to own themselves. As a corollary to this idea--I'm constantly surprised when I ask ski shop sales personnel if they've actually skied on a given model--and heard "no I haven't". And I am including mountain shops in this category too.
I think this raises another important point in my mind---if brick and mortar want to compete with Ski Essentials and alike they need a find way to offer distinctive reason why. ( i know off topic). For example--especially here in a mountain town, maybe the shop could have a sales rep on the hill at from noon to 1 3x a week and ski with perspective customers--to evaluate their skill set...is just an idea. Sadly for the brick and mortar shops--I think its tough for them to find good experienced hard good sales people and they're forced to devote 80% of their floor space and inventory to apparel because that's where the margins are higher. The is another reason why people are on the wrong skis.
Blame the shop and it's employees... I've found that most consumers ignore the advice of the shop/employees and just buy the latest hype machine that is being promoted on the interweb. Our local hills are in a relatively low snow area, with few powder days, and most skiers would be best served with a low 80's waist, firm snow oriented model. However, they won't even consider that category. It has to be over 100mm and rockered like crazy. Can you ski predominately firm and/or groomed conditions with that category of skis? Yes, but it's a lot of work and not that fun (imho). They won't be caught dead skiing on a "carving" ski. We give them the "talk" and try to make a case for "narrowish", firmer-snow oriented, ski models. For the most part, we are summarily ignored. So, to stay in business, we sell them what they want. You want to look for someone to blame, then focus on TGR, Matchstick, Warren Miller and the marketing departments who capitalize on that image.
On that note: is ski brand advertisement different in the US than in Europe? Here (Europe), I see ads like the ones below. Is that different in the US?You want to look for someone to blame, then focus on TGR, Matchstick, Warren Miller and the marketing departments who capitalize on that image.
Same in US. Top skiers on high performance skis selling the stoke. Very rarely do I see a beginner or intermediate skier pictured just cruising down a green beginner hill or making slow, very deliberate turns across a wide blue.On that note: is ski brand advertisement different in the US than in Europe? Here (Europe), I see ads like the ones below. Is that different in the US?
View attachment 144107
View attachment 144108