Well, Stormrider 102 is the obvious solution that comes to mind. If you dont get it too long, its a pretty playful ski with a lot of carvability. Head Cores are light and capable, but stiff, so you need to drive them a bit.
A contrarian opinion is that if you have a soft snow ski, go all in on the soft snow capabilities, and get something around 110 width (especially if you are in CA or WA, where the snow is wetter and heavier), and don't worry about groomer performance.
Any wider ski will feel slower edge to edge, just because of the width and it will be more difficult to put them on a proper edge angle than a narrower ski. By that nature wider skis amplify technical flaws (to an extent). When people write about "playful chargers", they are not thinking about quickness on the groomer, it is always more about the ability to smear to shut off the speed, glaze the bump, or adjust your line mid-turn (AKA the Tahoe turn) , which is not what you are after at all. The only wide skis that I tried that have great edge hold were Stocklis and similar premium (>$1,000) brands like Kastle, Augment, etc. So the Stormrider 102 is not a silly proposition, you may even end up skiing it everyday in the West... And SR102 is not a burly ski by any means...