Science to the rescue:
Comparison of the Enforcer 88 and 94
(It takes a few seconds for the all the graphs to generate)
Here are some interesting data snippets regarding the flex comparison:
Enforcer 88 EI Index: 8 / 22 / 38 / 24 / 11
Enforcer 88 GJ Index: 15 / 30 / 46 / 28 / 13
Enforcer 94 EI Index: 10 / 25 / 45 / 27 / 13
Enforcer 94 GJ Index: 16 / 34 / 51 / 31 / 15
I know most readers on this site aren't familiar with these flex measurements, but fellow golfers might be. Here are the explanations from the SoothSki site.
Bending (EI) Stiffness Index
Bending stiffness is the measure of how hard it is to flex a ski. The stiffness index is a five-zone measure of the ski's stiffness, from tip to tail. The higher the bending stiffness, the more you need to push into the ski to flex it and the more stable it will be at speed. Skis with lower bending stiffness are easier to turn and skid.
Torsional (GJ) Stiffness Index
Torsional stiffness is the measure of how hard it is to twist a ski. The stiffness index is a five-zone measure of the ski's stiffness, from tip to tail. Skis with higher torsional stiffness have better edge grip in icy or hard conditions, while skis with lower torsional stiffness are easier to turn and skid.
And here's the full
Guideon how to use the ski comparison tool.
What these numbers are telling us is that these two skis are quite different. They do not simply vary only by their widths. The Enforcer 94 is a much more substantial ski (as I noted in my first post in this thread). These flex differences change how the 94 will ski in comparison to the 88. Please re-read my first post as my thoughts there are directly supported by this data.
I want to thank
@AlexisLD for making this service available to the skier community. When I checked out their site last season, this new tool was the missing piece. Now that they have made this freely available, I believe that the more technically-inclined among us will find this data incredibly valuable.