@Skifore, I completely understand the tension/uncertainty between a mid/heavier touring ski and a light alpine ski.
I got a pair of Salomon all MTN 95 skis for touring. I'm much bigger than you, about 6'4" and 210 lbs, so the 95 made more sense than the 88, but I can basically support everything that Blister and others have said about that skis...it's incredibly versatile and competent and impressive...for what is is, a light, directional, touring ski. And yet, I still find myself wanting "more ski." If I did it again (and I might change for next season) I'd get a wider, heavier, more rockered ski, with a lighter binding. For me, that would be a ski in the 50-50 category, with a weigh target of about 1850 grams. For you an equivalent 50/50 ski would be much lighter in absolute terms. Its actually not so easy to find a lighter, more rockered ski--the Line Vision 98 comes to mind, about 1500 grams with real rocker (see below), but I think the shortest length is 172...probably too long for you?
About rocker, as PowHog pointed out, nearly all touring skis these days are described as having some "light" tail rocker and/or taper, but it's nothing in the league of skis like your Black Crows Birdie or the Blizzard Sheeva I mentioned. I'm looking at some skis right now, and the tail of my Salomon MTN 95 resembles the tail of my dedicated piste carving skis far more than it does that of my rockered all mountain skis.
So, yes, modern touring skis tend to have tail "rocker" but that's a little like how the industry talked about "all-mountain" skis about 5-10 years ago (and still often today) which were really just slighly wider piste skis with some light tip rocker. Go to Blister and look at the rocker profile pictures of the Majesty Superwolf, for example. (by all accounts a great skis, like the Salomon 88 and 95). The tail of that ski is basically flat! There's really not any real rocker.
In my experience (and this is just my perspective) in any kind of snow where you have to be "in" the snow and not "on" the snow, including powder, but also any dense heavy snow, soft snow, crud, ice, and so on, the narrow and relatively flat tails of piste skis and light touring skis just sink down and they're hard to release, especially with a tired body, heavy backpack, light boots and bindings, a directional stance, and so forth. To maneuver these skis, you have to be going fast, and/or your timing and weighting/un-weighting and really just everything about your technique needs to be really, really good to make those skis fun, and safe. Then there is the whole question about damping, suspension, and so forth.
I think the lighter alpine ski needs to stay in consideration. I'll say it again: with a light binding and a mid/heavy boot, I don't think you'll really notice the weight on the way up. It's sort of like how, when they reach the high mountains, some Tour de France champions have been known to switch to heavier more durable wheels for their bicycles, to mitigate the risks of the descents...
But it all depends on your priorities and skills. If you have a classic background on alpine skis, and really dialed technique, you'd probably do fine on modern light touring skis.
blisterreview.com
