• For more information on how to avoid pop-up ads and still support SkiTalk click HERE.

EV Vehicle Only Thread

Paul Lutes

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Posts
2,182
Lots to like about the Lucid Gravity, but I'm curious about the rear window visibility - seems limited. This is kind of a sore spot for me with my current vehicle.
 

anders_nor

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Posts
2,373
Location
on snow
wellll winter is here, Im charging had some nice days where I had to do 2x DC charge and 6x AC charges.. brrrrr -9c
 

dovski

Waxing my skis and praying for snow
Skier
Joined
Jan 7, 2018
Posts
2,699
Location
Seattle

On his top 10 list of worse EV cars - the worst EV he has reviewed
Yes so many issues with this car it is not funny, but that is what happens when you ignore EVs and then realize a little too late that you need an EV strategy. Unfortunately for Toyota they have a lot of catching up to do and so far all we have seen is a lot of future forward announcements around solid state batteries and amazing performance coupled with some very very poorly constructed EVs. Hopefully they can turn things around and stay relevant ... time will tell.
 

Don't Skip Leg Day

Getting off the lift
Skier
Joined
Mar 29, 2023
Posts
141
Location
Tahoe
Just bought my wife a Hyundai Ioniq 5. RWD version, gets about 330 miles per charge. Pretty sweet ride.
IMG_6079.jpeg
 

tball

Unzipped
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
4,351
Location
Denver, CO

slemmo

Putting on skis
Skier
Joined
Sep 21, 2022
Posts
51
Location
Norway
I was talking about cars in general, not only EVs and the japanese economy is not booming like it used to, so we shall see. My money is on US and Chinese car makers.
 
Last edited:

locknload

Out on the slopes
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Posts
1,427
Location
Carlsbad

oldschoolskier

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Posts
3,988
Location
Ontario Canada
What's the point of your post? Cherrypicking one extreme data point to somehow prove that ICE vehicles are superior? Not getting that.
Its not one point, just an indication of what is happening.

Several friends in different car companies are already expressing the issue with gas free vehicles and the issues they are seeing, because of friendship they advise against EV's as the problems are just beginning to show and show expensively for owners. Cost of ownership is not that which was indicated.

Again, EV's and Hybrids have an important role in being environmentally responsible, but how it is being sold will have a negative backlash that could end the goal.
 

locknload

Out on the slopes
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Posts
1,427
Location
Carlsbad
Its not one point, just an indication of what is happening.

Several friends in different car companies are already expressing the issue with gas free vehicles and the issues they are seeing, because of friendship they advise against EV's as the problems are just beginning to show and show expensively for owners. Cost of ownership is not that which was indicated.

Again, EV's and Hybrids have an important role in being environmentally responsible, but how it is being sold will have a negative backlash that could end the goal.
Well it is one point...the example you shared and nothing else. What data and support are your "friends" providing to substantiate it further? I mean, I could list you a laundry list of ridiculously expensive repairs that I've have had to pay for in my years of owning ICE vehicles and a million stories of what happens when ICE cars are out of their warranty period. How about 5K for replacing my AC compressor b/c they had to remove the dashboard? Still...I won't generalize that all ICE cars and some brands are better than others. Just trying to understand how your comment advances the conversation b/c it seemed like an attempt somehow claim that just b/c your car has lasted 408K miles its somehow better than a lot of the great innovation going on in the EV industry.
 
Last edited:

oldschoolskier

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Posts
3,988
Location
Ontario Canada
Well it is one point...the example you shared and nothing else. What data and support are your "friends" providing to substantiate it further? I mean, I could list you a laundry list of ridiculously expensive repairs that I've have had to pay for in my years of owning ICE vehicles and a million stories of what happens when ICE cars are out of their warranty period. How about 5K for replacing my AC compressor b/c they had to remove the dashboard? Still...I won't generalize that all ICE cars and some brands are better than others. Just trying to understand how your comment advances the conversation b/c it seemed like an attempt somehow claim that just b/c your car has lasted 408K miles its somehow better than a lot of the great innovation going on in the EV industry.
Well since you asked Ford, VW and Tesla are the manufacturer sources. Technical articles again for various industries that deal with the development for these same products.

Again learn to read between the lines, the industry is screwing themselves by how they are pushing the industry, when it hits public knowledge hard.....you do the math.

Like I said this method of travel is required, but make sure it lasts long term.
 

locknload

Out on the slopes
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Posts
1,427
Location
Carlsbad
Well since you asked Ford, VW and Tesla are the manufacturer sources. Technical articles again for various industries that deal with the development for these same products.

Again learn to read between the lines, the industry is screwing themselves by how they are pushing the industry, when it hits public knowledge hard.....you do the math.

Like I said this method of travel is required, but make sure it lasts long term.
When you say stuff like "learn to read between the lines" you lose all credibility bc you sound arrogant, condescending and a know it all. I'm not going to "do the math" ..whatever that means... b/c I asked you to back your assertion with facts and sources and not just refer to random "technical articles". You've provided none. I'm open to hear the point of view it seems like you are pushing but you don't provide anything but your own random opinion...so it's nothing more than that. We all have opinions, but to be credible on a topic you have to provide some facts and data underpinning your analysis...doesn't seem like you want to do that which is fine. Thanks for your opinion.
 
Top