Are the grip walk race bindings ok?
I don't think there is such a thing.
Are the grip walk race bindings ok?
I have a Marker x-comp 16 / piston plate set up that is GripWalk compatible.I don't think there is such a thing.
I have a Marker x-comp 16 / piston plate set up that is GripWalk compatible.
Yeah, Look Rockerace.My kid has dabello. Why my boots came with them I have no idea. Just luck i guess. Reminds me his lugs aren’t going tp work with the race skis - he didn't race last year so it didn’t come up. I might get him some new race skis anyways so I can use them too and would get gw compatible bindings.
Are the grip walk race bindings ok?
From Tyrolia website:Speaking of Tyrolia, is the Attack 14 MN the same as the old Attack 14 AT? I still have the 14 AT that is handy for those of us that work on the mountain and some days need an AT boot for dexterity, etc.
I don't see where it says it does.If 14 GW accommodates ISO 9523 why is there a 14 MN?
MN (Multi-Norm) means to accommodates all three soles.If 14 GW accommodates ISO 9523 why is there a 14 MN?
You should forward release fine, but lateraly release from the toe will be severly compromised to the point the boot will NOT release.If you put a GW boot into non GW binding, what is expected result?
The question was why MN and GW. The spec for GW Attack, does not say it is ISO 9523 Type approved.I found this table the other day. Quite helpful.
Thanks, that is what I needed. I have a few friends who still do GW on non-GW bindings no matter I what I tell them.You should forward release fine, but lateraly release from the toe will be severly compromised to the point the boot will NOT release.
I hope they have a low insurance deductible because that toe is NOT releasing in a twisting fall.Thanks, that is what I needed. I have a few friends who still do GW on non-GW bindings no matter I what I tell them.