I'd rather get a car that is in the middle to end of it's product cycle than at the beginning.
i think the tundra was at the end of its cycle five years ago.......
I'd rather get a car that is in the middle to end of it's product cycle than at the beginning.
It is on it's re-cycle.i think the tundra was at the end of its cycle five years ago.......
Yup, New Grill Technology.NGT?
It’s odd - the Lexus variant never did much for me. Current gen, I really don’t like the grille, and I much prefer the LC cockpit to the Lexus. And I don’t want to have 2 massive screens behind the front seats that, given my intended use of this car, will mostly collect inordinate amounts of dog slobber. I understand these are 1st world problems of course.That is what I found irritating -- why not continue to sell the LC as an mid-lux option? Leave some of the bells and whistles for the Lexus.
More on this the grillz on the LX570s are just hideous these days (heck, as are all Lexus IMO) - and make bumper upgrades a big challenge and greater expense.Yup, New Grill Technology.
Lexus's Preditor grill is awfulMore on this the grillz on the LX570s are just hideous these days (heck, as are all Lexus IMO) - and make bumper upgrades a big challenge and greater expense.
On price . . . it IS eye wateringly expensive, the Land Cruiser in shiny show-room floor newness. The talking points justifying the price belay some truth - they're built to a standard, not cost, like the Mercedes W123/124s of yore. If you peek under an LC and start comparing build spec, quality to other vehicles - it's not even close. Even examples within Toyota are remarkable, things like a tie rod end between a 200 series LC vs a Tundra (closest relative) to say, a Sequoia - the LC part is beefier, stronger, better in every regard. Things like solid box frame 100% of the chassis in LC vs partial box in Tundra. This list is long. And, frankly for the vast majority of US consumers the LC platform is gross overkill for their needs. You just don't "need" most of that stuff if you're not hardcore offroading or overlanding.Not sure I get the sticker price - I thought the Landcruiser was always designed to take what the Jeep and Landrover Defender did and do it more reliably for longer. Obviously over time a little comfort crept in not unlike the LR Disco but its always seemed to me the byword in vehicles for harsh environments (alongside the Hilux which is the byword in mobile turrets for militias).
It changed massively over the years. The first I remember in my family was the 60 model, cloth seats, 4 speed. It was basically a tractor. Vague steering, not lux at all - it was when the U in SUV meant something. Then there was the 80 with the bulging fender attachments over the wheels. 6 cylinder but a little nicer. Leather and still had the manual transfer case/locking diff. The American press said it was underpowered. The 100 series got the V8 if I remember correctly, originally 4.6 liters if memory serves. We still have one. It was super lux by Toyota standards, and our example still has the floor mounted cellular phone holder. The current/final gen takes that even further. The soul of the LC is the same, but to compare any current, popular SUV to the LC is to compare Laffy Taffy to the old school salt water stuff still made by hand by the old man or woman with a candy shop off the courthouse square in any anonymous town that time has forgotten. It’s just different, and must be experienced in person to understand what you have. Pretty sure I mentioned this, but again, I’m a hopelessly biased fanboy.Not sure I get the sticker price - I thought the Landcruiser was always designed to take what the Jeep and Landrover Defender did and do it more reliably for longer. Obviously over time a little comfort crept in not unlike the LR Disco but its always seemed to me the byword in vehicles for harsh environments (alongside the Hilux which is the byword in mobile turrets for militias).
I have a strange dislike-verging-on-hatred for the word "Lexus." Revulsion, I guess, like how some people can't deal with "moist."
I have a strange dislike-verging-on-hatred for the word "Lexus." Revulsion, I guess, like how some people can't deal with "moist."
I'd rather get a car that is in the middle to end of it's product cycle than at the beginning.
There are times when new is less expensive than used. It falls under "Don't confuse how you spend your money with how much money you spend."Yes indeed. And I started out looking at old beaters, then decided I had enough vehicles with high mileage, so then looked at 2- or 3-yr-old versions, but Toyota. A, say, 2018 with 25K on it was like $2K less than I paid, and didn't have the free scheduled maintenance, full amt of warranty, etc. Seems kind of dumb. So brand new (which I never ever ever do).
Throw 0% financing into the mix, warranty extensions, maintenance plans - yeah. Gotta do the maffs.There are times when new is less expensive than used. It falls under "Don't confuse how you spend your money with how much money you spend."
Almost all car buying decisions that real people make are financially stupid. No matter how pretty, it’s usually a depreciating asset, which means it’s not really an asset at all. It’s just a tool, a thing.Throw 0% financing into the mix, warranty extensions, maintenance plans - yeah. Gotta do the maffs.