I’ve never skied a130. I took a couple runs and they feel fine but I need to get the cuffs moved in before I can ski them more.Mine should arrive next week, how stiff do you find them compared to a 130 recretional boot?
I’ve never skied a130. I took a couple runs and they feel fine but I need to get the cuffs moved in before I can ski them more.Mine should arrive next week, how stiff do you find them compared to a 130 recretional boot?
Is there a spoiler in the ZJ?the Redster forward lean feels LESS than The ZJ.
No. I removed it.Is there a spoiler in the ZJ?
Hard to know--this just goes to show you that leg length, ankle mobility, foot size, and so much more play into what forward lean actually shakes out to for each skier. There are some amazing threads on the forum that discuss it ad-nauseum and I've been referring to those in the past two days to gain a better understanding of what I need to aim for in "net" forward lean. I have 20 degrees of dorsiflexion (no surprise there.) If I go by the "net forward lean" goal of matching that, then I need to gain 6 degrees from a spoiler and lifting the toes (hopefully inside the boot.)It's been a bootfitting session for the last 6 pages.
So the Lange's stated 12 degrees of forward lean are greater than the Atomic's 17? Would that be related to the interplay between forward lean and bootboard - is Lange's really 4 degrees? - or does Lange's info differ significantly from the actual product`?
I'm not sure I understand. Why would you want to match 20°? I have a lot of dorsiflexion range and would rather have a stiff enough boot to keep me from using anywhere close to my full range. My Fischers are at 14° with the option of 17 or 18°. I tried that and felt like I was going to flex on my face. The Fischers are a 130 and when I was lighter the were fine. I've since put on a bunch of pounds and crush them. Hmmm...lose weight or new boots...I have 20 degrees of dorsiflexion (no surprise there.) If I go by the "net forward lean" goal of matching that
You don’t. You net it. The formula is in a thread @KingGrump posted earlier.I'm not sure I understand. Why would you want to match 20°? I have a lot of dorsiflexion range and would rather have a stiff enough boot to keep me from using anywhere close to my full range. My Fischers are at 14° with the option of 17 or 18°. I tried that and felt like I was going to flex on my face. The Fischers are a 130 and when I was lighter the were fine. I've since put on a bunch of pounds and crush them. Hmmm...lose weight or new boots...
To elaborate, you take the forward lean of the boot and subtract the ramp angle of the boot board. So for me, that's 18-4=14. I have 20 degrees of dorsiflexion, so in theory I need to net another 6 degrees of forward lean to match the angle of my tibia. Both Otto and Bud had outlined this formula in other threads about a year ago. I never quite understood it, but it's making more sense now. The net forward lean isn't all from the cuff in situations like this. It can come from the toe or heel of the boot board, too.You don’t. You net it. The formula is in a thread @KingGrump posted earlier.
There are some amazing threads on the forum that discuss it ad-nauseum and I've been referring to those in the past two days WITH THE HOPE OF CONFUSING MYSELF TO THE POINT OF NO RETURN.
All other things being equal, get new boots. You can have them tomorrow ... faster, easier, cheaper.Hmmm...lose weight or new boots...
Oh, I got to that point a looonnng time ago!FIFY!
J/K -- good luck with the new boots.
Oohhh internet boot fitting session coming up!
They're a little too red. I think they scare him@AmyPJ, what are Oscar’s thoughts on the boots?
scaredy cat ... scaredy catThey're a little too red. I think they scare him
They're a little too red. I think they scare him