Good for the soul!That's good for the sport of skiing as a whole.
Oh thanks!Apparently skipping LL was part of the plan-
That helps clarify her decision.
Nice to be back on topic
Good for the soul!That's good for the sport of skiing as a whole.
Oh thanks!Apparently skipping LL was part of the plan-
I agree with this. Thanks DavidWell, if anyone wants to write a manifesto on what's wrong with society, or more specifically how sports should be organized, all well and good, but can we keep this thread a little more focused on our admiration and appreciation for this woman's skill and dedication that has resulted in her being an amazing skier, and follow her pursuit of excellence and becoming the most accomplished alpine skier in World Cup history?
Right, and these are not binary questions and often it is matter of degree. But...
Consumer demand is manufactured via marketing. If not Mikaela then profiteers would be hawking something else. I'm arguing for a more organic, genuine process not tied to selling something.
How many of those young female fans of Mikaela bought the $150 pink ski poles that are hardly different than the $25 ski poles, especially in the hands of a 10-year old intermediate? And that $125 price difference, mostly profit is above and beyond the cost and reasonable profit.
Libertarian economics -/ nah
There’s nothing wrong with criticizing the commercialization of the sport. But if someone doesn’t have respect for Shiffrin and her accomplishments and dedication to the sport (@Parnellia seems to imply that they would have more respect for her if she was a recreational skier having babies right now!), then I don’t know why they’re here. Like someone else said, this thread is for appreciating this legendary athlete. Stating that her choice of profession is morally wrong is certainly not that.@Parnellia is actually quite righ with this. Maybe you and me didn't buy anything because of Shiffrin or Hirscher or I don't know who (I buy Barilla because of their pasta and couldn't care less if Shiffrin has their logo on helmet or not, as if nothing else I was buying Barilla pasta before she ever made it to World cup and way before she signed her deal with Barilla). But look around a bit. Around here (Slovenia, Austria, Italy, France, Switzerland) you go skiing, and there's 1000s of little Hirschers around you. All of them in full Atomic outfit with Raiffeisenbank logos on helmets. And with "little Hirschers" I didn't mean 10 years old kids only, but also 70 years old grandpas and everyone else in between.
But then again, is this bad thing? I don't know, it's part of the business, and it makes so many people live from this. Without this, companies wouldn't be interested in sponsoring anything, and without sponsors and without money, we can literally forget about any top level sport. For sure top level/pro sport is not something that needs to exists for anyone to survive, but neither does music, film, theaters and 1000s other non-essential professions and services. And even though pro sport doesn't need to exists, it's still nice to watch it sometimes. After spending more then half of my life in pro sport (as athlete and as coach and serviceman later), I probably look at this different then most, but for me it's good thing to have. If you are still active and do sport, it gives you some perspective to huge difference between your abilities and what human are really capable of. With just recreational sport, we would see performances that are 10% of what human body is really able to achieve. Sure it wouldn't be end of the world, but I think it's not all that bad to have pro sport either. And on the end, everyone him/herself decides if they want to spend money on something just because some athlete wears, eats, drives or ski with. If someone wants to do that fine, if not it's also fine.
I mean she was already in NA for the Killington races...She was never going to ski everything so it's not really a big deal skipping a trip back to NA to get in more (glacier?) training blocks.
Re adulation of sports stars - she's admirable for her work rate and positive attitude. I suspect she's also become more of a rounded human being as a result of (pretty sad) life experiences and when she calls it it'll be right for her regardless of whether she's smashed records or not along the way. I'd hope the team around Project Shiffrin have at least a weather eye out on "what next" even while she remains focused on the job.
Well I didn't know this in bold either. I thought this thread was for things about Shiffrin, not just about praising her. But I'm from otherside of the ocean, where things are (still) not only PC and nothing bad should be said, so maybe I got this part wrong.There’s nothing wrong with criticizing the commercialization of the sport. But if someone doesn’t have respect for Shiffrin and her accomplishments and dedication to the sport (@Parnellia seems to imply that they would have more respect for her if she was a recreational skier having babies right now!), then I don’t know why they’re here. Like someone else said, this thread is for appreciating this legendary athlete. Stating that her choice of profession is morally wrong is certainly not that.