- Joined
- Aug 5, 2017
- Posts
- 1,625
I did a super quick search yesterday, and there a several news articles about the accident close in time to when it occurred, where people stated their riding/boarding level, indicated they were at the resort the day of the accident, and their opinions on the conditions at the resort that day. They include self-professed experts who say they fell, etc., on the run; were shocked it was open; etc. If I were the plaintiffs’ attorney, these are the people I’d be telling the resort I’d call as witnesses to a potential trial.Again, it's an awful thing that happened; no one is arguing that. However, the list of alleged duties in the suit make me wonder: how many other people who were not informed, didn't have someone telling them the exact conditions, etc. did NOT have a similar result that day. If that lift was running there were likely hundreds of other skiers going to the top, off loading at the same spot, and encountering the same conditions. I would wager not all those other skiers were expert skiers, the only ones who could negotiate poor conditions.
There’s always an issue with how reliable those witnesses are, but it would be highly entertaining to see who calls themself an expert skier under oath.