Central Oregon.... PNL? Left of what?
Central Oregon.... PNL? Left of what?
Doesn't matter what kind of signage the resort employed. There will always some clueless ones that will drop in and get over terrain. Then blame the resort.
Seen it often enough.
Central Oregon.
Denial. At least for part of the state.This would be the follow up question in Jaywalking - Which state is Oregon in?
Denial. At least for part of the state.
Yes but from a liability standpoint, when things get litigated, proper, accurate signage favors the resort over the cluess who ignored said signage. Was the trail skiing how it was labeled at the time? Yes? Idiot touron can go pound sand,. Was it skiing entirely different than labeled? Yes? Resort can go pound sand..Doesn't matter what kind of signage the resort employed. There will always some clueless ones that will drop in and get over terrain. Then blame the resort.
Seen it often enough.
The answer is California.This would be the follow up question in Jaywalking - Which state is Oregon in?
Since a child was involved, we were slower. Page 4-Surprised nobody's mentioned that blue trails are where most skiers die.. Or, more accurately hooking an edge and veering right off of blue trails in to trees.
Most deaths do occur on blues, generally involving trees.
Yes but from a liability standpoint, when things get litigated, proper, accurate signage favors the resort over the cluess who ignored said signage. Was the trail skiing how it was labeled at the time? Yes? Idiot touron can go pound sand,. Was it skiing entirely different than labeled? Yes? Resort can go pound sand..
I've been saying either make it a black permanently even though it's probably super easy when hero snow or close it when it's skiing gnarly.... Plenty of testimony here from people who know this trail that intermediate skiers don't belong on this trail when it's unusually icy. What's the downside to labeling it a black?What sort of signage are you suggesting?
Yes, I would personally like it if snow conditions were posted and accurate - I typically ask people on the lift where they have been skiing and 'where is the snow good?' I also watch people coming down to gauge how firm it is and how good you need to be to ski something well. But things can change so quickly, I don't see how you could label everything fast enough. Wind gusts, sun, snowfall, skier traffic, etc all change the character very quickly.
When I ski in a group, people tend to have wildly different impressions on what 'icy' really is depending on their ability and even what side of the run they came down. I may find the run to be excellent snow, but someone else complains it is too icy. And to a former ski racer, the condition would be too soft/slushy for them and their equipment setup. A local may consider the run to be skiing better than usual. Someone who skis mainly at Vail may consider it to be abysmal, or wonder why it is even open at all with all the rocks poking through. Different resorts have different thresholds for coverage when they open things.
The conditions signs I have seen posted are generally:
Thin Cover // Early Season Conditions Exist
Variable Conditions (sometimes Spring Conditions)
Experts Only, No beginners (this one does scare a few away, but you still get some self-proclaimed intermediates / advanced attempting to ski it anyway).
People who COULD ski it fine in good conditions may not ski it and miss the experience. Word would get out that it's not REALLY a black, so go ahead and ski it. Then we end up back where we are. I'm more for the "Blue, but conditions can and do change frequently and without warning" type sign at the bottom of the lift.What's the downside to labeling it a black?
I understand this argument that "fools be fools" and nothing can ever be enough for them. But what about the non-fools that primarily lack information or experience particuarly in local conditions/terrain.
Most of the skiing world doesn't nerd out on micro weather nor have the skills to truly ski anything in front of them or even judge if they have the skills. Some if travelling for the first time from tame, small hills may be simply be overwhelmed by scale and variation in conditions let alone navigation. Plus people screw up every day in all sorts of mundane things. Failsafes help.
Yes but from a liability standpoint, when things get litigated, proper, accurate signage favors the resort over the cluess who ignored said signage. Was the trail skiing how it was labeled at the time? Yes? Idiot touron can go pound sand,. Was it skiing entirely different than labeled? Yes? Resort can go pound sand..
Dude, not satisfied with teaching people how to ski? Now, you want to teach them geography?
Jay Leno JayWalking: Geography Test
Most skiers from east of the Rockies think of the skiing the Rocky Mountains resorts as skiing out west. CO, UT & WY. Oh yeah, NM, that 3rd world country.
The Sierras and Cascade? You mean there is something further west than the Rockies?
Oh yeah, California, been there once. PNL? Left of what?
I really believe this kind of signage was in place at this particular lift when we skied Bachelor, but I'd lean to the locals for confirmation.Doesn't matter what kind of signage the resort employed. There will always some clueless ones that will drop in and get over terrain. Then blame the resort.
Seen it often enough.
I took a road test for a fuel truck co. During the extensive driving part the evaluator asked me what was the last road sign I saw. I had to think for a second.....I drove fuel for awhile. It wasn't for me.I really believe this kind of signage was in place at this particular lift when we skied Bachelor, but I'd lean to the locals for confirmation.
It's not uncommon for there to be so much signage that people become oblivious to the message(s)