- Joined
- Mar 20, 2017
- Posts
- 786
This is more of a general discussion point, not pertinent to any decision I have to imminently make. It’s just something I’ve not quite understood, and hope people can resolve my ignorance. I’ll relate my question to my personal experience though.
So I often see people say on this site that they size down their ski boots. one recent example close to home is a person indicating they are a 275mm foot length, 43 euro, but size down to a 26.5 mondo ski boot. There are obviously many other examples of this.
So relating it back to me, I have a 265mm foot, use 42 Euro shoes when that’s the sizing, and have 26.5 mondo boots. I was getting new foot beds recently and when doing the shell sizing check the fitter said I had a very tight fit - less than a finger space.
It seems to me if I went to a 25.5 Mondo my boot would just be too short for my foot.
So what am I missing? How are people able to cram their foot into boots that in my experience at least would be shorter than their foot length? And if they do that, why is that desirable?
So I often see people say on this site that they size down their ski boots. one recent example close to home is a person indicating they are a 275mm foot length, 43 euro, but size down to a 26.5 mondo ski boot. There are obviously many other examples of this.
So relating it back to me, I have a 265mm foot, use 42 Euro shoes when that’s the sizing, and have 26.5 mondo boots. I was getting new foot beds recently and when doing the shell sizing check the fitter said I had a very tight fit - less than a finger space.
It seems to me if I went to a 25.5 Mondo my boot would just be too short for my foot.
So what am I missing? How are people able to cram their foot into boots that in my experience at least would be shorter than their foot length? And if they do that, why is that desirable?