So I bought a couple pairs of ski pants to try on and I was quite surprised by some very simple issues in these $300 ski pants. Problems that my cheap, old zipzone pants don't have and I didn't think should even be a consideration.
First is the Helly Hansen Garibaldi 2.0. The hip pockets are tiny! I can't fit my hand even most of the way in, nor will my phone fit in an up and down orientation. The thigh pocket has more room, but the zipper opening is too small. My hand could squeeze in...without a glove on.
Second is the Outdoor Research Ascentshell. The thigh pockets are on the front of the leg instead of the side and extend over the knee. Don't put anything hard in those pockets or it'll be bouncing against your knee everytime you move. (I use OR pants when climbing and was definitely expecting better). Also, the black isn't black, it's gray. Obviously, not a big deal unless one requires black pants.
Is this normal for ski pants in this range? Are pockets just an afterthought and not really meant to be used? They seem almost like decoration rather than useful.
First is the Helly Hansen Garibaldi 2.0. The hip pockets are tiny! I can't fit my hand even most of the way in, nor will my phone fit in an up and down orientation. The thigh pocket has more room, but the zipper opening is too small. My hand could squeeze in...without a glove on.
Second is the Outdoor Research Ascentshell. The thigh pockets are on the front of the leg instead of the side and extend over the knee. Don't put anything hard in those pockets or it'll be bouncing against your knee everytime you move. (I use OR pants when climbing and was definitely expecting better). Also, the black isn't black, it's gray. Obviously, not a big deal unless one requires black pants.
Is this normal for ski pants in this range? Are pockets just an afterthought and not really meant to be used? They seem almost like decoration rather than useful.