Personal preference. I just found slimmer/lighter poles easier to flick my wrist for a pole plant.Just curious: Why would the diameter of the pole be such an important selection criteria?
When Marc Giardelli was racing he wind tunnel tested poles. I am going to take some liberty with these numbers but he found that the Goode 10.4 poles were up to .25 seconds faster that a traditional aluminum pole and that could be the difference between first and not winning.Just curious: Why would the diameter of the pole be such an important selection criteria?
I see what you did there!!I do have some Goode 10.4 downhill poles if anyone is interested.
?, no these are serious downhill poles with the bends and all.I see what you did there!!
The double down!!?, no these are serious downhill poles with the bends and all.
I mean these are only for the advanced skier. Not for plugs like me.?, no these are serious downhill poles with the bends and all.
Especially on "firm" snow.Exel has carbon tapered pencil poles. They are quite thin. I have had a hard time to find baskets for them, so I got some Goodes. I like the flex of slim poles, I think it gives some shock absorbtion
Personal preference. I just found slimmer/lighter poles easier to flick my wrist for a pole plant.
And at speed, there is a noticable difference in swinging a pencil thin pole and a traditional aluminum pole.Ahhh-Haaa! So you are really looking for lowest swing weight, rather than smallest diameter. So you want lightweight poles with lightweight baskets to give you the quickest wrist-flip pole plants. That might actually be achieved with larger diameter carbon fiber poles with very small baskets -- rather than a smaller diameter aluminum pole with standard baskets.
Ohhh??? I had no idea slimness and lightness were not mutually exclusive! Thank you for this insight--all I knew was that the ultra-thin LEKI poles I demo-ed some years back felt super nice (especially for quieting my upper body while making quick-tempo short turns) and I've been drooling for it since but I didn't know the model so I thought someone might mention them in this thread (sorry for fishing) or at least suggest some similar alternatives.Ahhh-Haaa! So you are really looking for lowest swing weight, rather than smallest diameter. So you want lightweight poles with lightweight baskets to give you the quickest wrist-flip pole plants. That might actually be achieved with larger diameter carbon fiber poles with very small baskets -- rather than a smaller diameter aluminum pole with standard baskets.
Are we triple downing? lolAnd at speed, there is a noticable difference in swinging a pencil thin pole and a traditional aluminum pole.
And at speed, there is a noticable difference in swinging a pencil thin pole and a traditional aluminum pole.
He is absolutely correct, swing weight has much to do to with it. In some applications its referred to as unsprung weight.Ohhh??? I had no idea slimness and lightness were not mutually exclusive! Thank you for this insight--all I knew was that the ultra-thin LEKI poles I demo-ed some years back felt super nice (especially for quieting my upper body while making quick-tempo short turns) and I've been drooling for it since but I didn't know the model so I thought someone might mention them in this thread (sorry for fishing) or at least suggest some similar alternatives.