"Team Tactics" are starting to happen on Gravel Races

crosscountry

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Jun 6, 2021
Posts
851
Location
all over the place
Because early adopters had romantic notions of doing an end-around existing rule making organizations, tiered competition and fun-sucking tactics by expounding on the 'newness' and 'down to earth' of the subsport. And that got picked up by event marketing - there is no gravel event anywhere that doesn't have populist promotion.

And so this thread is really about how much growth-related cancer gravel events can sustain without being forced drop the populist pretense, without rulesing up and without strictly enforced category/tier/qualifier splits.
Are "Fondo" races? Do those have to conform to rule making organizations?
 

Rudi Riet

AKA songfta AKA randomduck - a USSS coach, as well
SkiTalk Tester
Contributor
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
1,728
Location
Washington, DC
Are "Fondo" races? Do those have to conform to rule making organizations?

It depends.

There is a UCI Gran Fondo series with a world championship event every year. There are a smattering of UCI sanctioned GF events in the U.S. (the national champs are always in Frederick, MD, in mid-September). There are other series (e.g. the Gran Fondo Campagnolo series) that are similar in scope. All adhere to WADA anti-doping rules. Example: Gran Fondo New York (part of the Campagnolo series) had a history of winners failing doping tests over the years.

That said, they aren't all UCI qualifiers. The technical difference between a gran fondo and a century ride is timed ascents: the fondos all have timing on the climbs, whereas the century rides don't have such a requirement.
 

cantunamunch

Meh
Skier
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Posts
17,112
Location
Peanut Butter and Banana Belt
Surprising probably no one in this thread, Unbound are splitting off the elite field, banning the elite from using aero bars, and putting course marshals at intersections.


#whattookemsolong
 
Top