I too like twin tips for the reasons you've described, if they retain the ability to rail on edge.
If the 2.0 retains its damp yet playful feel, it sure looks likely to be a winner! Even before, it seemingly felt more precise and not as heavy or slightly vague as the Enforcer 104 Free (though not quite as nice in playful mode), and at least felt more damp than the 102 Fischer (though not as incredible at tracking on edge). If it retains or improves on those abilities, and gains in stability and carving, it may well in some ways potentially improve on those two already good skis.
On the 3.0, the old 2.0 was slightly too turny for me, whereas the 3.0 was just right, and besides being a great powder ski, was, for me, a "cheater" ski at soft or powder bumps: it seemed to turn on its radius, feeling like I was turning on the circumference of a circle, so to speak - even in bumps (or especially in bumps). And it was beautifully balanced in terms of dampness versus liveliness. Its weakness, for me, was that it got tossed a bit in heavy crud, or I'd have bought it.
Do you know if that ski has stiffened up as well?
The 3.0 was changed last year to 112mm underfoot with a SLIGHT weight(50 grams) and radius drop(1-2m) and then this years the core was changed and now weight up 200 grams and radius back similar to the previous 108mm version. Flex seems to be similar on all versions.
So it should ski similar to the old 3.0 with an extra 200 grams to help it’s crud performance. Haven’t tried it yet but have seen lots of good reviews on them.
The 2.0 should definitely be “less turny” by slightly narrowing the tip(135mm to 131mm) and tail(135mm to 127mm) so it’s directional now while staying 102mm underfoot. Turning radius up to 20m in the 183cm now(17m before I think). So it should increase carving capabilities while maybe reducing float a bit. Less tip rocker than either the Enforcer 104 or Fisher 102 FR with tail rocker and overall flex in between the two of them. Much stiffer and heavier than the old 2.0.
So I’m hoping it will have similar edge grip and carving ability of the Fisher 102 but be more damp. Have the suspension and silence on firm snow of the Menace 98 but better shaped tips for crud busting and lower swing weight. Have similar playfulness of the Enforcer 104 but more stable at high speeds with better edge grip and quieter on firm snow. Think it won’t float quite as well as the E104 or 102FR but should still be fairly decent.
Dying for the enforcer/Fisher/2.0 cage match along with trying out my new Kendo 88s and Moment Wildcats. Going to have a very full car the first day of skiing!!!