• For more information on how to avoid pop-up ads and still support SkiTalk click HERE.

Vail Resorts- a new leaf?

DanoT

RVer-Skier
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
4,806
Location
Sun Peaks B.C. in winter, Victoria B.C. in summer
Earlier, I was giving compliments to Vail for getting all those folks to buy their cheap passes and in so doing, making non Vail resorts less crowded. Now all the dissatisfied Vail customers are going to go elsewhere in 2022-23, making the non Vail resorts more crowded.

Maybe 2022-23 will be the year to ski Epic? :duck:
 

raytseng

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Posts
3,347
Location
SF Bay Area
Earlier, I was giving compliments to Vail for getting all those folks to buy their cheap passes and in so doing, making non Vail resorts less crowded. Now all the dissatisfied Vail customers are going to go elsewhere in 2022-23, making the non Vail resorts more crowded.

Maybe 2022-23 will be the year to ski Epic? :duck:

I commented before that I feel it is a pendulum and it does swing and then overcorrect. The snow always seems less crowded on the other side. Even a marginal 10% of people shifting changes everything.
 

Ken_R

Living the Dream
Skier
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Posts
5,775
Location
Denver, CO
Earlier, I was giving compliments to Vail for getting all those folks to buy their cheap passes and in so doing, making non Vail resorts less crowded. Now all the dissatisfied Vail customers are going to go elsewhere in 2022-23, making the non Vail resorts more crowded.

Maybe 2022-23 will be the year to ski Epic? :duck:
Yep. Its gonna be a back and forth from here on out. Specially in Colorado.
 

robertc3

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Sep 12, 2017
Posts
515
Location
Kenmore, WA
More negative press for VR.

The floggings will continue until morale improves.

I am hopeful the pressure on VR will grow and keep pushing the price of MTN down. In the last month it is down 8% while the S&P 500 is essentially flat.
 

Muleski

So much better than a pro
Inactive
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Posts
5,243
Location
North of Boston
I’ve held off on posting, for a few reasons. I could go on for pages, but I will not. I’ll just say that I have had a fair amount of involvement with Rob Katz since his Apollo PE days. My brother is a retired PE “big hitter”, and we {I think} understand it. Along with the ski business.

As part of a large and long active ski family, we have been really conflicted as investors in MTN, and in fact we’re now all out. As of this fall. Full disclosure, we are in on KSL.

MTN has been a great “roll up” model for in particular Rob Katz, his senior team and the organizations who hold most of the stock. Rob has coined enormous personal wealth as have many of his now and mostly former senior staff. A quick look at their bios will show that these are not “ski people.” Nor, really, is Rob. This is not a ski company. Not close.

My brother goes back to the Booth Creek days, and has been pitched, hard, many times. He’s a very serious skier, lots of experience and friends, but he has largely stayed away from VR as he felt so conflicted.

Years ago, he told me that while he did not think Katz was all that smart, he felt he was “absolute genius” in structuring this. I will not go into all of the weeds, but think of a few key factors:

1. Public Company, with really no similar competitors. Because all of the big firm NYC analysts following the stock also follow cruise lines, casinos, beach resorts, golf resorts, etc. nobody would really dig into this.

2. Katz and team put enormous effort into selling this group, who essentially make the market for the stock, on the fact that his Epic Pass was revolutionizing the industry in many positive ways..for all. So….they pretty quickly made Epic Pass Sales….the number sold {not even the $$$} the most important metric. All that mattered. “How are Epic Sales, Rob?”

2A. That is very unique. You can grow revenue a lot of ways. It has never really seemed to matter for MTN if it was organic growth, or by acquisition. Which seems odd. But then again, Katz was not some slimey casino guy…..he’s a Wall Street guy living the dream on the front range. So if he seriously overpays to get more passholders….that still works.

3. Obviously, you need to hit your numbers. As somebody now retired from a couple of C level public company jobs, and two stints in PE, I have never missed the Q EPS numbers….and did “a lot of quarter to quarter managing” to do so. Katz knows the game. Do not miss.

4. So we see these acquisitions that to skiers make NO SENSE if you really dig into them. The feeder mountain strategy only appeals to the clueless. We see and experience a long list of operating snafus…almost disasters. We see the old guard if real ski operators moved out. We see a lot of departments gutted and centralized. All standard stuff for a “roll up.” And we see huge problems with crowds.

5. We sell the analysts on this really being the experience of a lifetime. I wonder if any visit? If they do, they get ultra special treatment….like the most important guests ever, because they are.

So….Katz is no fool. He knows that at some point this gets ugly. He gets a bit of a hall pass with COVID. The potential future of weather in ski land is only discussed to the point where the brilliant Epic Pass protects them. ALL ABOUT EPIC NUMBERS.

They know full well that people are furious with Vail. The most furious are either thise who’s home mountain was acquired and now “just totally sucks.” Or, the big hitters who come to Vail, BC and others on their private jets, for a couple of weeks at Christmas as they always have….and now experience this total and complete shit show.

I have not checked Katz’s trading. As the non exec chair of the board, unloading piles of his holdings is not totally unusual. But, he knows.

Meanwhile the analysts start to open their eyes, maybe talk quietly amomg themselves. WTF is going on with MTN?

And MTN is ahead of it. Some COVID issues, serious shortage of employees, problems with the usual So. American workers, and….lousy weather, lack of snow. Huge lack of open terrain and lifts. Shitty grooming and snow. Mostly Omicron…… Lots of “reasons” to be sold.

There is much to be learned by the analysts, but again, it’s one sliver of what they cover. So how much do they care. Hell the stock has been a good one.

But WE don’t ski as investors. Conflicting goals.

I am not alone in thinking that Katz knew that the street would buy whatever he sold them, and that he could greatly influence things. And he sure did.

Was the VR internal focus on the ski experience, the ski product? Hmmm. Maybe not so much. ONLY to the extent that it had to be.

In terms of this looking like a big “ski company” run by “ski people” trying to win new customers, and keep the loyal others, by having a GREAT ski experience…I would say no chance. That’s where the Vail Sucks rants come from…deservedly so.

So you have Katz driving up until recently “The Ski Investment Experience of a Lifetime”….while the actual ski experience sure seems problematic. It is.

I know so many real long time, multigenerational ski families who these days pretty much hate skiing. Almost always crowd related. In every respect. Traffic, parking, the lodges, liftlines, crowded hills, packed lodges.

A friend in Stowe told me yesterday that he would “gladly” pay five times their current pass cost, or more, if he could roll the clock back.

Not sure where this is headed…..it sure is a mess. I would like to see the stock actually tank more, but I do not see how and when that improves the product.

If you’re on a call and the question is “How do we improve the experience and the product, and make MORE customers happy, while also keeping our financials solid and the stock price up?”

Good F’ing Question.
 
Last edited:

johnnyvw

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Dec 20, 2016
Posts
1,689
Location
near RDU
More negative press for VR.

When I first saw that (within the hour) I checked the Jack Frost webcam. There are two lifts there, I think both are triples. They only had one running. No surprise at all they had an hour+ wait. For a 90 second run (if you ski slowly..)
 

Wendy

Resurrecting the Oxford comma
Admin
Skier
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Posts
4,911
Location
Santa Fe, New Mexico
More negative press for VR.

Cecily Tynan and her husband are loyal Jack Frost skiers; their kids have been in the race program for years. They are very well known in this part of PA and are also very well-heeled. Negative press from Cecily Tynan goes a long way.

She’s also a hell of an athlete.
 

Roundturns

Getting off the lift
Skier
Joined
Nov 29, 2017
Posts
397
I’ve held off on posting, for a few reasons. I could go on for pages, but I will not. I’ll just say that I have had a fair amount of involvement with Rob Katz since his Apollo PE days. My brother is a retired PE “big hitter”, and we {I think} understand it. Along with the ski business.

As part of a large and long active ski family, we have been really conflicted as investors in MTN, and in fact we’re now all out. As of this fall. Full disclosure, we are in on KSL.

MTN has been a great “roll up” model for in particular Rob Katz, his senior team and the organizations who hold most of the stock. Rob has coined enormous personal wealth as have many of his now and mostly former senior staff. A quick look at their bios will show that these are not “ski people.” Nor, really, is Rob. This is not a ski company. Not close.

My brother goes back to the Booth Creek days, and has been pitched, hard, many times. He’s a very serious skier, lots of experience and friends, but he has largely stayed away from VR as he felt so conflicted.

Years ago, he told me that while he did not think Katz was all that smart, he felt he was “absolute genius” in structuring this. I will not go into all of the weeds, but think of a few key factors:

1. Public Company, with really no similar competitors. Because all of the big firm NYC analysts following the stock also follow cruise lines, casinos, beach resorts, golf resorts, etc. nobody would really dig into this.

2. Katz and team put enormous effort into selling this group, who essentially make the market for the stock, on the fact that his Epic Pass was revolutionizing the industry in many positive ways..for all. So….they pretty quickly made Epic Pass Sales….the number sold {not even the $$$} the most important metric. All that mattered. “How are Epic Sales, Rob?”

2A. That is very unique. You can grow revenue a lot of ways. It has never really seemed to matter for MTN if it was organic growth, or by acquisition. Which seems odd. But then again, Katz was not some slimey casino guy…..he’s a Wall Street guy living the dream on the front range. So if he seriously overpays to get more passholders….that still works.

3. Obviously, you need to hit your numbers. As somebody now retired from a couple of C level public company jobs, and two stints in PE, I have never missed the Q EPS numbers….and did “a lot of quarter to quarter managing” to do so. Katz knows the game. Do not miss.

4. So we see these acquisitions that to skiers make NO SENSE if you really dig into them. The feeder mountain strategy only appeals to the clueless. We see and experience a long list of operating snafus…almost disasters. We see the old guard if real ski operators moved out. We see a lot of departments gutted and centralized. All standard stuff for a “roll up.” And we see huge problems with crowds.

5. We sell the analysts on this really being the experience of a lifetime. I wonder if any visit? If they do, they get ultra special treatment….like the most important guests ever, because they are.

So….Katz is no fool. He knows that at some point this gets ugly. He gets a bit of a hall pass with COVID. The potential future of weather in ski land is only discussed to the point where the brilliant Epic Pass protects them. ALL ABOUT EPIC NUMBERS.

They know full well that people are furious with Vail. The most furious are either thise who’s home mountain was acquired and now “just totally sucks.” Or, the big hitters who come to Vail, BC and others on their private jets, for a couple of weeks at Christmas as they always have….and now experience this total and complete shit show.

I have not checked Katz’s trading. As the non exec chair of the board, unloading piles of his holdings is not totally unusual. But, he knows.

Meanwhile the analysts start to open their eyes, maybe talk quietly amomg themselves. WTF is going on with MTN?

And MTN is ahead of it. Some COVID issues, serious shortage of employees, problems with the usual So. American workers, and….lousy weather, lack of snow. Huge lack of open terrain and lifts. Shitty grooming and snow. Mostly Omicron…… Lots of “reasons” to be sold.

There is much to be learned by the analysts, but again, it’s one sliver of what they cover. So how much do they care. Hell the stock has been a good one.

But WE don’t ski as investors. Conflicting goals.

I am not alone in thinking that Katz knew that the street would buy whatever he sold them, and that he could greatly influence things. And he sure did.

Was the VR internal focus on the ski experience, the ski product? Hmmm. Maybe not so much. ONLY to the extent that it had to be.

In terms of this looking like a big “ski company” run by “ski people” trying to win new customers, and keep the loyal others, by having a GREAT ski experience…I would say no chance. That’s where the Vail Sucks rants come from…deservedly so.

So you have Katz driving up until recently “The Ski Investment Experience of a Lifetime”….while the actual ski experience sure seems problematic. It is.

I know so many real long time, multigenerational ski families who these days pretty much hate skiing. Almost always crowd related. In every respect. Traffic, parking, the lodges, liftlines, crowded hills, packed lodges.

A friend in Stowe told me yesterday that he would “gladly” pay five times their current pass cost, or more, if he could roll the clock back.

Not sure where this is headed…..it sure is a mess. I would like to see the stock actually tank more, but I do not see how and when that improves the product.

If you’re on a call and the question is “How do we improve the experience and the product, and make MORE customers happy, while also keeping our financials solid and the stock price up?”

Good F’ing Question.
Muleski as usual “nails it” IMHO. MTN certainly not run to enhance the skier experience. The industry was for the “taking” and Katz envisioned how he could dominate and roll it all up and create a “kingdom”. However , now the paying public knows they have been had. The product held so near and dear is compromised and skiers feel compromised.
We will find out in time if this business plan by MTN has any prospects for being sustainable.
Serious skiers are “addicts” and will put up while “bitching” at the same time with aboutbanything to ski.
I think (don’t know) there is an important segment of the skier revenue pie that might spend their money elsewhere if they experience a lousy time on a ski vacation after paying top dollar.
Stay tuned.
 

geepers

Skiing the powder
Skier
Joined
May 12, 2018
Posts
4,292
Location
Wanaka, New Zealand
But WE don’t ski as investors. Conflicting goals.

Muleski, your post an excellent summary.

The two sentences above are the sad, tragic bit.

It's bad enough when it merely hurts a popular past time. Now image how it seems to people whose livelihood or very existence is threatened by decisions made continents away. By people who probably aren't even "conflicted".

Would add that the term investors sort of makes it seem a faceless "them". We need to keep in mind that many of us will have significant dollars in managed funds intended for retirement (401K in the USA IIRC) and may be passively part of this. The faceless can be us.
 

Ken_R

Living the Dream
Skier
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Posts
5,775
Location
Denver, CO
I’ve held off on posting, for a few reasons. I could go on for pages, but I will not. I’ll just say that I have had a fair amount of involvement with Rob Katz since his Apollo PE days. My brother is a retired PE “big hitter”, and we {I think} understand it. Along with the ski business.

As part of a large and long active ski family, we have been really conflicted as investors in MTN, and in fact we’re now all out. As of this fall. Full disclosure, we are in on KSL.

MTN has been a great “roll up” model for in particular Rob Katz, his senior team and the organizations who hold most of the stock. Rob has coined enormous personal wealth as have many of his now and mostly former senior staff. A quick look at their bios will show that these are not “ski people.” Nor, really, is Rob. This is not a ski company. Not close.

My brother goes back to the Booth Creek days, and has been pitched, hard, many times. He’s a very serious skier, lots of experience and friends, but he has largely stayed away from VR as he felt so conflicted.

Years ago, he told me that while he did not think Katz was all that smart, he felt he was “absolute genius” in structuring this. I will not go into all of the weeds, but think of a few key factors:

1. Public Company, with really no similar competitors. Because all of the big firm NYC analysts following the stock also follow cruise lines, casinos, beach resorts, golf resorts, etc. nobody would really dig into this.

2. Katz and team put enormous effort into selling this group, who essentially make the market for the stock, on the fact that his Epic Pass was revolutionizing the industry in many positive ways..for all. So….they pretty quickly made Epic Pass Sales….the number sold {not even the $$$} the most important metric. All that mattered. “How are Epic Sales, Rob?”

2A. That is very unique. You can grow revenue a lot of ways. It has never really seemed to matter for MTN if it was organic growth, or by acquisition. Which seems odd. But then again, Katz was not some slimey casino guy…..he’s a Wall Street guy living the dream on the front range. So if he seriously overpays to get more passholders….that still works.

3. Obviously, you need to hit your numbers. As somebody now retired from a couple of C level public company jobs, and two stints in PE, I have never missed the Q EPS numbers….and did “a lot of quarter to quarter managing” to do so. Katz knows the game. Do not miss.

4. So we see these acquisitions that to skiers make NO SENSE if you really dig into them. The feeder mountain strategy only appeals to the clueless. We see and experience a long list of operating snafus…almost disasters. We see the old guard if real ski operators moved out. We see a lot of departments gutted and centralized. All standard stuff for a “roll up.” And we see huge problems with crowds.

5. We sell the analysts on this really being the experience of a lifetime. I wonder if any visit? If they do, they get ultra special treatment….like the most important guests ever, because they are.

So….Katz is no fool. He knows that at some point this gets ugly. He gets a bit of a hall pass with COVID. The potential future of weather in ski land is only discussed to the point where the brilliant Epic Pass protects them. ALL ABOUT EPIC NUMBERS.

They know full well that people are furious with Vail. The most furious are either thise who’s home mountain was acquired and now “just totally sucks.” Or, the big hitters who come to Vail, BC and others on their private jets, for a couple of weeks at Christmas as they always have….and now experience this total and complete shit show.

I have not checked Katz’s trading. As the non exec chair of the board, unloading piles of his holdings is not totally unusual. But, he knows.

Meanwhile the analysts start to open their eyes, maybe talk quietly amomg themselves. WTF is going on with MTN?

And MTN is ahead of it. Some COVID issues, serious shortage of employees, problems with the usual So. American workers, and….lousy weather, lack of snow. Huge lack of open terrain and lifts. Shitty grooming and snow. Mostly Omicron…… Lots of “reasons” to be sold.

There is much to be learned by the analysts, but again, it’s one sliver of what they cover. So how much do they care. Hell the stock has been a good one.

But WE don’t ski as investors. Conflicting goals.

I am not alone in thinking that Katz knew that the street would buy whatever he sold them, and that he could greatly influence things. And he sure did.

Was the VR internal focus on the ski experience, the ski product? Hmmm. Maybe not so much. ONLY to the extent that it had to be.

In terms of this looking like a big “ski company” run by “ski people” trying to win new customers, and keep the loyal others, by having a GREAT ski experience…I would say no chance. That’s where the Vail Sucks rants come from…deservedly so.

So you have Katz driving up until recently “The Ski Investment Experience of a Lifetime”….while the actual ski experience sure seems problematic. It is.

I know so many real long time, multigenerational ski families who these days pretty much hate skiing. Almost always crowd related. In every respect. Traffic, parking, the lodges, liftlines, crowded hills, packed lodges.

A friend in Stowe told me yesterday that he would “gladly” pay five times their current pass cost, or more, if he could roll the clock back.

Not sure where this is headed…..it sure is a mess. I would like to see the stock actually tank more, but I do not see how and when that improves the product.

If you’re on a call and the question is “How do we improve the experience and the product, and make MORE customers happy, while also keeping our financials solid and the stock price up?”

Good F’ing Question.

Your summary explains everything pretty clearly. Thanks.


Whenever anyone makes something mostly a Financial Instrument, which is what Vail/MTN is, it turns to crap. The people who had to / wanted to make their money already did. This has happened to so so many companies. It is to a large degree the normal course of things in the USA unless the thing/product in question is overseen by some independent entity that evaluates specific metrics (to the product not the financial instrument, the product behind it) and keeps things in check. Even so a lot turns to crap.

Like you mentioned, it is not the first time a lot of analysts or experts fail to physically go and check out things first hand and experience the product/s behind the stock / financial instrument and talk to the people who actually do the work.
 
Thread Starter
TS
SkiSchoolPros

SkiSchoolPros

Impact Ecosystem- ie.Money with Meaning
Skier
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Posts
207
Location
Colorado
Beginners can pay less, too. If they are only on the carpet, or the green slopes, they aren’t using much of any mountain. Could also help with the high cost of entry into the sport. I’m learning tele this year and right now only need easy runs. If I could’ve paid a little less for my pass, with access limited then I’d put that money into more lessons. But I don’t know if others think that same way, and limiting access to lifts is one thing but at smaller hills, one lift often serves multiple terrain options.
Vail had a chair 12 & 15 beginner ticket, but eliminated it this season.
 
Thread Starter
TS
SkiSchoolPros

SkiSchoolPros

Impact Ecosystem- ie.Money with Meaning
Skier
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Posts
207
Location
Colorado
The reason I assumed that most VR (MTN) investor's would be skiers is because I thought some other motivation besides making money would be behind the investment decision. This is because, who in their right mind invests in a seasonal industry that is weather dependent, in a world where weather is becoming more extreme and less predictable and dependable?

I wonder what the mutual fund and other institutional investors see in Vail Resorts (MTN)?

There are far more sellers of ski resorts than there are buyers. The most recent ski development that failed before it even started is Valemount, B.C., lots of local support, no big investor.

B.C.'s newest resort, Revelstoke (now 12 or 13 y.o.), has struggled since day one, with the original owners selling out after one year.

Kicking Horse, the original owners sold out after a few years of loosing money.

It is tough to make $ in the ski industry, at least in Canada. Maybe that is why Vail owns very few truly Canadian resorts (I have always claimed that Whistler is a US resort, located in Canada ;) ).
Investors like things that go up in price and pay out $. Pre-Covid the quarterly shareholder dividend was raised from $0.207 in 2013 to $1.76 in 2019 and Q1 2020. It's down to $0.88 currently, but still up more than 4x from 2013. https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/mtn/dividend-history
The stock price has done even better going from under $20 in 2009 to ~$287 currently.
 
Thread Starter
TS
SkiSchoolPros

SkiSchoolPros

Impact Ecosystem- ie.Money with Meaning
Skier
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Posts
207
Location
Colorado
I’ve held off on posting, for a few reasons. I could go on for pages, but I will not. I’ll just say that I have had a fair amount of involvement with Rob Katz since his Apollo PE days. My brother is a retired PE “big hitter”, and we {I think} understand it. Along with the ski business.

As part of a large and long active ski family, we have been really conflicted as investors in MTN, and in fact we’re now all out. As of this fall. Full disclosure, we are in on KSL.

MTN has been a great “roll up” model for in particular Rob Katz, his senior team and the organizations who hold most of the stock. Rob has coined enormous personal wealth as have many of his now and mostly former senior staff. A quick look at their bios will show that these are not “ski people.” Nor, really, is Rob. This is not a ski company. Not close.

My brother goes back to the Booth Creek days, and has been pitched, hard, many times. He’s a very serious skier, lots of experience and friends, but he has largely stayed away from VR as he felt so conflicted.

Years ago, he told me that while he did not think Katz was all that smart, he felt he was “absolute genius” in structuring this. I will not go into all of the weeds, but think of a few key factors:

1. Public Company, with really no similar competitors. Because all of the big firm NYC analysts following the stock also follow cruise lines, casinos, beach resorts, golf resorts, etc. nobody would really dig into this.

2. Katz and team put enormous effort into selling this group, who essentially make the market for the stock, on the fact that his Epic Pass was revolutionizing the industry in many positive ways..for all. So….they pretty quickly made Epic Pass Sales….the number sold {not even the $$$} the most important metric. All that mattered. “How are Epic Sales, Rob?”

2A. That is very unique. You can grow revenue a lot of ways. It has never really seemed to matter for MTN if it was organic growth, or by acquisition. Which seems odd. But then again, Katz was not some slimey casino guy…..he’s a Wall Street guy living the dream on the front range. So if he seriously overpays to get more passholders….that still works.

3. Obviously, you need to hit your numbers. As somebody now retired from a couple of C level public company jobs, and two stints in PE, I have never missed the Q EPS numbers….and did “a lot of quarter to quarter managing” to do so. Katz knows the game. Do not miss.

4. So we see these acquisitions that to skiers make NO SENSE if you really dig into them. The feeder mountain strategy only appeals to the clueless. We see and experience a long list of operating snafus…almost disasters. We see the old guard if real ski operators moved out. We see a lot of departments gutted and centralized. All standard stuff for a “roll up.” And we see huge problems with crowds.

5. We sell the analysts on this really being the experience of a lifetime. I wonder if any visit? If they do, they get ultra special treatment….like the most important guests ever, because they are.

So….Katz is no fool. He knows that at some point this gets ugly. He gets a bit of a hall pass with COVID. The potential future of weather in ski land is only discussed to the point where the brilliant Epic Pass protects them. ALL ABOUT EPIC NUMBERS.

They know full well that people are furious with Vail. The most furious are either thise who’s home mountain was acquired and now “just totally sucks.” Or, the big hitters who come to Vail, BC and others on their private jets, for a couple of weeks at Christmas as they always have….and now experience this total and complete shit show.

I have not checked Katz’s trading. As the non exec chair of the board, unloading piles of his holdings is not totally unusual. But, he knows.

Meanwhile the analysts start to open their eyes, maybe talk quietly amomg themselves. WTF is going on with MTN?

And MTN is ahead of it. Some COVID issues, serious shortage of employees, problems with the usual So. American workers, and….lousy weather, lack of snow. Huge lack of open terrain and lifts. Shitty grooming and snow. Mostly Omicron…… Lots of “reasons” to be sold.

There is much to be learned by the analysts, but again, it’s one sliver of what they cover. So how much do they care. Hell the stock has been a good one.

But WE don’t ski as investors. Conflicting goals.

I am not alone in thinking that Katz knew that the street would buy whatever he sold them, and that he could greatly influence things. And he sure did.

Was the VR internal focus on the ski experience, the ski product? Hmmm. Maybe not so much. ONLY to the extent that it had to be.

In terms of this looking like a big “ski company” run by “ski people” trying to win new customers, and keep the loyal others, by having a GREAT ski experience…I would say no chance. That’s where the Vail Sucks rants come from…deservedly so.

So you have Katz driving up until recently “The Ski Investment Experience of a Lifetime”….while the actual ski experience sure seems problematic. It is.

I know so many real long time, multigenerational ski families who these days pretty much hate skiing. Almost always crowd related. In every respect. Traffic, parking, the lodges, liftlines, crowded hills, packed lodges.

A friend in Stowe told me yesterday that he would “gladly” pay five times their current pass cost, or more, if he could roll the clock back.

Not sure where this is headed…..it sure is a mess. I would like to see the stock actually tank more, but I do not see how and when that improves the product.

If you’re on a call and the question is “How do we improve the experience and the product, and make MORE customers happy, while also keeping our financials solid and the stock price up?”

Good F’ing Question.
This is a great post that should be widely read, especially by the USFS brass who thinks they are an equal partner with their ski resort concessionaires who are providing experiences of a lifetime. https://www.fs.usda.gov/speeches/ski-areas-enduring-partnership

"So it’s pretty obvious that the ski industry contributes tremendous value to the American people. Your activities account for a big part of the way we serve the American people, and the Forest Service is important in turn to the national ski industry.

Taking Home Memories

Whatever we do, we’ve got to make sure that our visitors get what they come for so they keep coming back. In my view, what brings people out into the woods and makes them want to come back are the memories. Most people will always remember...learning how to ski. Often, ski resorts create the first or the main memories people have of their public lands. People will always remember particular ski trips and ski slopes. People come to the national forests for memories like these.

Our job, as I see it, is to make sure that people take home the memories they come for. That includes furnishing the services they need—the roads, the slopes, the facilities, and everything else. It also includes furnishing reasonable access to all kinds of opportunities for outdoor adventure... Both the Forest Service and the NSAA are in the people and visitor experience business."

On a side note related to @Muleski 's post , one way VR has juiced the Epic Pass numbers is by introducing Epic 1, 2 & 3 day passes. With prices less than traditional multi-day passes, online purchases and ski with a friend/buddy pass rates, they have likely canibalized many of these sales in an effort to impress the Wall Street analysts (and lock people in before services are rendered).
 

Henry

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Posts
1,247
Location
Traveling in the great Northwest
Are the insiders, either a senior officer, director, or an above 10% equity owner, buying Vail Resorts stock or selling it?
1642740186045.png
 

fatbob

Not responding
Skier
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
6,334
I think many of the mountains would have no problem finding investors who would like to take them private again. Not sure what would happen to others.
Problem is valuation when Vail likely overpaid for them (as it was part of a story used to pump stock than a real intent to operate profitably and to customer satisfaction on the fundamentals). Vail wouldn't want anything to go at a loss cos then the analysts will really start to question them. Can see a few fringe assets go as part of a "concentrate on the core business and our best yielding properties" new story in which case valuation might be a pass.
 

Sponsor

Staff online

  • Andy Mink
    Everyone loves spring skiing but not in January
Top