Actually I like the Pivot 15 because I want to ski it at the DIN 6 setting. And I can just twist out at the lodge, while never pre-releasing on the hill. I want the all metal binding so it will still function 10 years from now and feel as solid as it does new.Not too long ago Attack was preferred, I guess for the in style and still desired low profile.
Firstmost the Looks are more expensive which is indicative of quality. Secondly, they are not Markers which hacks can't seem to get to function. Thirdly they come in 14 and or 15 din so overweight old people can dial that din up way beyond spec because they used to race in high school, or perhaps for the logically superior materials (my sub100 lb kid busted a worm gear screw on an other brand 11 demo). There is a body of thinkers who purport the Looks are technically superior and they love the color coordination options. The chartreuse in particular are very easy to click into even with a big chunk of ice on the heel lug.
Its like being 45 years old which I am, not quite 50, definitely not 39.
Snow/ice on the bottom of a ski boot? You must have lost your mind. I clean the bottom of my boot for ANY binding prior to clicking in because I actually want the binding to perform as expected.
I'm not sure what your rant is about but it certainly isn't based on the bindings performance. You can ski on whatever you like, if LOOK bothers you
there's lots of other choices.
Last edited: