Based on what you have said in the other thread, I actually think that the Evolve is better suited for "your preferred style of skiing" which you described as "leisurely cruising" blue groomers.
@Ron is right that the V92 is "better" and more engaging on groomers . . . IF you are driving the ski and actively pressuring the tips. On the other hand, if you are standing on the center of the ski, "cruising leisurely" I think that the looser shape of the Evolv 90 is better suited to that style, without giving up much connection and having comparable stability and snow feel. And the Evolv will be easier to manage off piste if your narrative is really cruise the blues, hit some soft snow, hit some bumps from time to time.
I think that part of the problem is that you might be over thinking this a bit and that some of the language being used here, in magazines, etc. . . and some of your assumptions aren't resonating with reality. There is no objective "better" - it really depends on a bunch of factors, the individual skier being a big one. For example, I think it is true that the V92 is "better" for carving groomed terrain if you have some basic, modern carving chops. But if you don't know how to do that or engage the ski properly, it will actually be worse (initially) than a looser shape with less tip engagement which would likely be easier, more fun and make you feel like a hero.
Listen to
@Ron on this one. . . he knows this line of skis really well and is giving you the right answer without necessarily "showing his work" or telling you explicitly what he is picking up by intuition. I don't agree that the V92 is the "holy grail" for you but for the fact that it is 92 instead of 88. It isn't the width, it is the shape (the difference between 88 and 92 isn't really the story). FWIW, the V92 actually skis much narrower than its profile (which is why it is cool for the right skier).