Random order commentaries:
1. This system unfortunately screws Squaw's most dedicated customers. If you come here a few weekends a year, you can manage the reservations, and the added cost will be noticeable but not a game changer. If you are a ski team family, you are already paying Squaw through the roof. For many of us who ski 40-50 days a year, that (a) almost triples the cost of skiing, and (b) makes it a huge hassle to keep making those reservations.
2. I will be happy to pay a reasonable amount (~$500-$700) for a season parking pass just to avoid the hassle of making those reservations over and over. This is really my main complaint about the new system. I expect that getting a parking reservation for a major holiday or a powder day will be worse than getting a Taylor Swift concert ticket. I just don't need this stress. Mark is indeed correct that it will be a hit for people on fixed income. Expect weekdays to become more popular among locals with flexible work schedules and retirees.
3. One of the best features of a season pass has always been its zero opportunity cost aspect. If you are not sure about the weather, you could come out for two runs, and if it sucked or you didn't feel like it, you could just go home. Now you will be out the parking fee. Still cheaper than the lift ticket, but not zero. I suspect this is one of the additional drivers for this system, eliminate people who drive a car alone to the resort just for a few morning runs.
4. They are talking about penalizing people who do not use their reservations up to pass suspension. This is ridiculous, what if I slipped on my driveway in the morning going to the hill and hurt my hip (if that sounds weirdly specific, well, you know...)?
5. Marks' (@unofficialalpine) solution of a resort-specific pass for 24-25 does not make any sense in light of his comment that PT is the only option for 100,000 people within 4-hour drive of the resort. How does that solve the problem, other than charging people more for the PT-specific pass (that is actually what they do at Windham, NY, so that is definitely a possibility)?
6. I still think this system will have a major positive impact on the morning congestion on 89 (unless it is a pow day), people will not have to get up at 6 am just to get a parking spot. Traffic will be spread out over more hours, that will be a major plus. Breakfast burrito sales will drop like a stone, and a lot less sh&t will be flushed down PT sewer pipes. Also a definite positive.
7. It is irritating to just read about their "plans" for transit solutions. Where are the parking lots in Truckee that would hold all those cars? Despite years of constant talk about regional transit solutions they remain (and will likely remain) non-existent. They cannot even figure out employee shuttles.
8. I still have friends whose kids are still in the ski team. I guess they will become a lot more popular next season ;-).
9. I am curious how that will go over. Squaw did try to put in place restricted carpool parking a few years ago, which more or less failed; that system is still formally there but is simply not enforced.
10. Ultimately, Mark is correct on at least one point, Alterra needs another big resort in the Tahoe areas (most logically, Sugar Bowl with a potential lift connection through Granite Chief). As far as I know it's not for sale.
11.* The overall outcome is that your skiing just got way, way more expensive.