Let me preface this with I don't own any wide charger skis, except my son's 184cm Bibby Pro. I haven't been on any of the skis in your quiver.
The CT 3.0 seems like a great ski for the Tahoe area. I spent a week there and experienced Sierra cement for the first time. A slight drift if you will indulge me, on day one's first run of the trip at Squaw, there was a long line on one lift and no line on another lift. In NE, you avoid lines. At Squaw, there is a reason why there is no line. Iciest trail I have ever been on, bar none. A few hours of sun later, great trail. Live and learn.
Greg reports the CT 3.0 is great in NE for frozen mornings that soften up into corn, mashed potatoes, slush. I have a old Ski Logik Ullr's Charriot twin tip, 101mm underfoot, 178cm, 15m turn radius. Its too short for someone my size, but I love the ski on spring days. Its full camber and carves really well, it has 145mm wide tips and floats on top of the slush, and can make any turn radius you want, but it doesn't pivot at all.
I see the CT 3.0 as the properly sized modern version of my Charriot and I will probably retire the Charriot. It has rocker, so it will pivot, it has a long effective edge (I measure my ski) so it will carve well. By its shape and turn radius it will be stable and a little jibby (not that I ?jibe?) and due to its stiffness and weight, it will charge and handle speed. I can tell it won't be as loose as the Bibby, due to less rocker, but what I love about the Bibby the most is you can go over any surface and nothing phases the ski. The CT 3.0 might not be quite as good on that feature, but its heavy enough to be very good. I am OK taking a chance on the ski.
The only other thing I could say is find someone with one next season, try it, and then go find a used one to buy if you like it. I am going to Taos for the meet up, and I will bring my CT 3.0 with me. I basically bought it for that trip, and other western adventures.
I do own a Blizzard Zero G 108mm ski in 185cm length. It is the same ski as a Cochise with a light weight core and carbon. Same shape and rocker. I don't think the CT 3.0 will be extremely similar to a Cochise, but could be used for similar conditions. Cochise likes really long radius turns or it want to pivot. Not much in-between that. I really like my Zero G as a touring ski and 50/50 resort ski, but it doesn't feel much like my Ski Logik twin tip ski. I expect the CT 3.0 to feel somewhat similar to the Ski logik, only better since it has decent rocker. The Ski Logik is surprisingly stable at speed, even with the 15m radius, so I have no doubt the CT 3.0 will handle lots of speed.