LOL. At 6'1" & 210 lbs, I was thinking 175 AX this year and an SR next year.
Win-win.
Just make sure SRs are 184.
LOL. At 6'1" & 210 lbs, I was thinking 175 AX this year and an SR next year.
2020 model here :Well, guess my decision has been made for me, can't find a single pair of 2021 Ax 175 anywhere. Haha
2021 LASER AX 175(ONLY ONE IN STOCK) here:
2021 LASER AX 175(ONLY ONE IN STOCK) here:
I think if one really doesn’t know, and you can’t try both, go for the AX. At least in the east. Everyone I know on the AX is very happy. At least two people I know on the AR not so much. There’s just not the smiles about loving it. They are not hard, chargey skiers making big turns all the time.The AX feels like a resort-oriented, mostly frontside all-mountain high-performance, carving-oriented design with a good variety of turn behaviors, while the AR feels like a wider, stronger platform definitely smitten with drawing strongly-carved GS radius turns deeply into the hill at higher speeds than the AX. If there were cruddy conditions...I would use the AR as the rock-solid platform of choice to generate float when needed, but freight-train through chop without any deflection or deviation from trajectory.
Where?Dammit. You rat bastards. Whoever got that pair before I did, congrats. I'm happy for you, and I hate you.
Thought of something that would help me alot with the AX vs AR decision. Let me paint a picture of a day.
You start the day on a few beautifully prepared low to mid angle groomed runs, the snow is softish so you are just trenching run after run with varying turn shapes but always at speed. Then you move runs and find a nice stash of 3" wind blow on the edges and ski that awhile. You move to the steep groomed runs where the soft snow is mostly skied off so that it is hard, not quite ice. Nevertheless you rip the runs in big GS turns top to bottom, the thought of speed checks never enter your mind. Finally you notice that the rope just dropped on that headwall thats been closed all week. There is 4" to 6" over small to middle sized bumps so you ski that a few times. Nice day, 20,000 vertical, time for lunch.
For those that have skied both what ski would you have rather been on, AX or AR?
You simply can't beat superior ski geometry no matter how much "baby seal fur" you use.
That's borderline blasphemy!
But I'll check those Pro MT 86 just to see what's what.
If that is your typical day is you got soft snow + 3" windblow and a ropedrop on 5" you should be having fun regardless and probably on not a laser.Thought of something that would help me alot with the AX vs AR decision. Let me paint a picture of a day.
You start the day on a few beautifully prepared low to mid angle groomed runs, the snow is softish so you are just trenching run after run with varying turn shapes but always at speed. Then you move runs and find a nice stash of 3" wind blow on the edges and ski that awhile. You move to the steep groomed runs where the soft snow is mostly skied off so that it is hard, not quite ice. Nevertheless you rip the runs in big GS turns top to bottom, the thought of speed checks never enter your mind. Finally you notice that the rope just dropped on that headwall thats been closed all week. There is 4" to 6" over small to middle sized bumps so you ski that a few times. Nice day, 20,000 vertical, time for lunch.
For those that have skied both what ski would you have rather been on, AX or AR?
Seeing as I have a new (to me) pair of RC GT One 86s in my closet I’m itching to ski this is actually music to my ears.
Somewhere here @Philpug said the RC 86 was the ski the AR wanted to be this cycle.