And, you guys - I'd still like to know, no fooling, if the newest Wildcats are for me, either or both of them, the 108s or the fatter ones. Or are they not quite damp enough yet, me being still so spoiled by the Bibby Pro/Blister Pro dampness and crud stability, having both the 184 and the 190 in Jack & Jill models?
Yeah, I figure that both 108 and 117/118 Wildcats are light and lively, lots of energy; carve as well as the Bibbys; may even float a bit better than the Bibbys - you'd have to tell me if this is so, dunno. And the 108s would not be overkill on less deep days. Lighter, not as tiring.
But I am gun shy from my experience with "more lively" powder skis: the Rossi Super 7 HDs (180 & 188) were very good, but required such active feet, a bit tiring and a drag in heavier crud, as I got older; and later the Rossi 190 Super 7 RDs also (although I have not tried the most recent slightly changed ones).
Those RD 190 things required such active feet, quickness, so lively, as if wanting me on uppers; and they required some speed to work right also, great for me at one time maybe, but not as an old guy - gradually a bit less a charger now.
@Ron , as a new guy on these things, with fresh experience underfoot, and with lots of experience of comparables, are these damp enough for a guy spoiled by the best of Moment damp skis, and winding down on the quick feet stuff? (Probably hard to say, if you've never been on the Bibby Pro/Blister Pro "playful chargers," to me a baseline standard in this category; but maybe.....)
@GregK , you in particular have lured me onward towards considering the latest Wildcats strongly. Have you gotten enough time on them now in this strange season to say how you like them (at either width) compared to the Bibby models, in crud and for float? (To me, easy float was the one thing the Bibbys were lacking just a bit, when things got really deep in particular.)