so without a deep dive here, you are comparing 2 skis that have a decent amount in common (both are chargers or can be skied that way) both are fairly stiff however the 3.0 is 112 underfoot and the Wildcat has considerably more splay but seemingly surpasses every other ski I've skied with that much splay. The wildcat can be skied precise and engages exceptionally well in chopped, loose snow (or spring slush) it simply comes down to this. if the 2 skis are somewhat similar and you want them for the same thing, soft, loose snow and powder days, I'll take the Moment every time. Last year, it was the Wildcat 108, Sali Stance 96 and Blossom SL as my "Best of the Season" skis, each in their own category of course but all 3 are quite strong skis. I am a technical skier. The Wildcat 108 is my favorite powder skier ever. I ski quite a bit of powder and the Wildcat, while still being a Charger, can be skied in almost any style and anywhere on the mountain with no compromises. I liked the 3.0 but its not as good across the board. YMMV. Skiers all have preferences or we would just have 5 skis on the market
![Smile :) :)]()
.
I could say you should be comparing the Wildcat 116 and not the 108 but, if you want more of a traditional ski, I would go with the CT. If you dont mind the 112 underfoot, that opens the field to a regular Wildcat, and again, for a 116 (except the 190) assuming you want them for deep days (your deep day and mine may be very different) again, I would grab the Wildcat. I am very comfortable skiing above the knee powder on the 108 (I used to ski a 100) but others may prefer a 116 or wider. Again, skier preference. I also ski a Praxis Protest fwiw.
you probably know this but here's the dims: note the tip width on the WC 108, it makes this ski so maneuverable in tight spots and especially trees, the 140 tip is quite a bit wider. Note the dims on the Wildcat 116, they are much more comparable to the CT 3.0. In the powder, the TR is irrelevant for the most part, however, I like the longer 22 and 25 for loose snow and powder over the 20
WC 108 (184)- 134-108-127 22tr
CT 3.0. (184) 140-112-134, 20tr
WC 116 (184)- 141-116-131 25tr
just to muck up the waters, you could look at the commander 108 for more charger, directional, traditional ski.