Andy Mink
Everyone loves spring skiing but not in January
Moderator
SkiTalk Tester
SkiTalk Supporter
@Stephen and I had the opportunity at the WWSRA demo event at Brighton to take several runs on Fischer's new RC4 MV 130 with the BOA. There's been a lot of discussion in this thread about the BOA. Hopefully we can answer some questions.
Here are some first impressions, not necessarily of the boot itself, but of the BOA.
First off, the BOA and cable are burly, more so than snowboard boots and way more than other footwear. The cable is rated at 450# or so. The knob is designed to "break away" with a stout impact and then snap back on. I didn't get to check that design feature but I've seen it.
Unlike some other BOAs the ski boot specific design can tighten or loosen by one or more clicks allowing for very accurate adjustment. Like other BOAs, a simple pull on the knob releases tension on the cable.
The manufacturers claim the cable system allows for a smooth, consistent closure of the lower portion of the boot and I'd agree. With a traditional buckle system, the top of the overlap can sometimes be pressed into the top of the foot with little effort. With the BOA system on the Fischer I could feel a gentle wrap around my forefoot. I liked that feel. The BOA also allows for very quick micro adjustments on the hill.
On the hill the boot skis as one would expect. The BOA is unnoticeable. My current boot is a Fischer RC4 The Curve GT 130; the RC4 MV is a bit roomier, especially in the toe box. Flex is similar. With the stock footbed and no canting the boot felt very stable and transmitted inputs well. Fischer does not offer a LV boot with the BOA, instead relying on the ability of the cable system to smoothly close and compress the clog. This won't work for everyone but should suit many.
So, BOA. Obviously the long term durability has yet to be seen by the consumer. If you're comfortable with your current boots there's no reason to toss them for BOA boots (or any other boots for that matter!). If you're looking for a new boot, they are worth a look. The initial hands on (feet in) look at the BOA seems to show more pluses than minuses, even if they're small pluses, over buckles.
Here are some first impressions, not necessarily of the boot itself, but of the BOA.
First off, the BOA and cable are burly, more so than snowboard boots and way more than other footwear. The cable is rated at 450# or so. The knob is designed to "break away" with a stout impact and then snap back on. I didn't get to check that design feature but I've seen it.
Unlike some other BOAs the ski boot specific design can tighten or loosen by one or more clicks allowing for very accurate adjustment. Like other BOAs, a simple pull on the knob releases tension on the cable.
The manufacturers claim the cable system allows for a smooth, consistent closure of the lower portion of the boot and I'd agree. With a traditional buckle system, the top of the overlap can sometimes be pressed into the top of the foot with little effort. With the BOA system on the Fischer I could feel a gentle wrap around my forefoot. I liked that feel. The BOA also allows for very quick micro adjustments on the hill.
On the hill the boot skis as one would expect. The BOA is unnoticeable. My current boot is a Fischer RC4 The Curve GT 130; the RC4 MV is a bit roomier, especially in the toe box. Flex is similar. With the stock footbed and no canting the boot felt very stable and transmitted inputs well. Fischer does not offer a LV boot with the BOA, instead relying on the ability of the cable system to smoothly close and compress the clog. This won't work for everyone but should suit many.
So, BOA. Obviously the long term durability has yet to be seen by the consumer. If you're comfortable with your current boots there's no reason to toss them for BOA boots (or any other boots for that matter!). If you're looking for a new boot, they are worth a look. The initial hands on (feet in) look at the BOA seems to show more pluses than minuses, even if they're small pluses, over buckles.
Last edited: