I agree Blister gives a much better review. I just thought it was funny that both Ski Essentials and Ski Town All Stars act like the Enforcer 110 Free is some insane big mountain ski that could only be used at Jackson Hole by an expert, but everyone in these forums says basically the opposite about it and that it’s very easy and fun to ski.
I ended up going with the Sender Free 110s. There’s a Blister review on youtube with a Rossi engineer. In that video the engineer discusses the mounting points. He says the “recommended” mount point (-4cm from center I believe?) will make it ski like a BO and the “directional” mount point (-6cm from center?) will make it ski like a sender. I’m planning to go right between those.
As the OP who owns a pair, I would say they are reasonably forgiving, and are not super stiff or unevenly flexing or anything. That said, they do have 2 sheets of titanal, and are Enforcers--they have a minimum speed limit IMO. I find them a bit planky at low speeds for sure (and again they are 110 underfoot metal skis). They are not the crazy narrower enforcers your daddy knew. But I find them a bit burly at times. Some of it is how I poorly ski still too.
The Unleashed 108s are a slightly different breed, 1/2 a sheet of metal rather than 2. Still nice shape. An option from Nordica that's a little less burly. I have the unleashed 98s which are a lighter, softer, I think more forgiving ski than the Enforcer 100s would be.
I would say (greg can correct me) Greg likes a relatively stable-at-speed, damp ski, which generally includes something with a little more mass to it.