I took my Agent 3 out twice now. Last time (Sunday), conditions were a mix. Deep and wet in places, some crust , some chopped up, some crud. In the deep snow, there is no question that they are my best ski for the conditions. But these are touring skis, and even though they are stiff, what they don't do is absorption of the terrain/bumps. Everything that you hit comes back to your legs, so it's harder to keep a confident steady path. As a daily driver, I much prefer the CT 1.0 for Tahoe.
The other thing is mount point. I wish I had these at the "candide" spot (new school mount line). I have them one notch behind, at "progressive". I will probably write a long term user review, but I'm still adjusting to them. And I'll see if I remount the shift bindings 1.5 cm forward. That would take some work, but might be worthwhile for my preference/limitations as a skier.
Edit: you do expect a resort ski to do better downhill, and particularly, in resort conditions (lots of skier created crud). These skis are designed to sacrifice some of the stability/dampness/suspension in favor of lightness, and not designed for a resort daily driver. I actually bought them so I can start venturing into the Touring/BC world.
Conditions below.