James, the RS Cosworth was a great car tat the time. The purity of the Mk2 was it was the last of the "real" RWD escorts and a bit more compact compared to the FWD ones.
The US spec escorts were pretty much complete crap, even the GT. I knew a couple of people with them and my father had one for a delivery vehicle. It was even worse than the Dodge Omni it replaced.1989 Ford Escort GT
View attachment 136544
Cheap, fun, pretty classic at this point. Sold in the US. Sadly the Euro Escorts would be a project to obtain unless your really into it. (Afaik, feds don’t care about cars greater than 25yrs old.)
Wouldn’t surprise me if you got a good one for say $4k and had it for 3-4 years that you could sell it for more. Not including maintenance, but maybe. (But I haven’t looked into current prices)
I beat a 93 Escort GT for four or five years. It weren't a complete pile. The drivetrain and suspension were Mazda parts and the engine and gearbox were gems. The suspension was well sorted if somewhat cheap. The interior bits were Ford and not terrible, if not spectacular. It was also among the cheapest cars you could buy in those days. No complaints here.The US spec escorts were pretty much complete crap, even the GT. I knew a couple of people with them and my father had one for a delivery vehicle. It was even worse than the Dodge Omni it replaced.
ETA: I just remembered I learned to drive a manual in my friend's '82.
Yeah I think it was based on 323 mechanicals but the 323 was better put together and you could get an awd turbo 323.I beat a 93 Escort GT for four or five years. It weren't a complete pile. The drivetrain and suspension were Mazda parts and the engine and gearbox were gems. The suspension was well sorted if somewhat cheap. The interior bits were Ford and not terrible, if not spectacular. It was also among the cheapest cars you could buy in those days. No complaints here.
Ford definitely got the better deal with that partnership!Yeah I think it was based on 323 mechanicals but the 323 was better put together and you could get an awd turbo 323.
I think that may be the case with every partnership between a US and Japanese brand. My wife almost bought a 92-93 MX6. We were both quite impressed on the test drive. We went to check out the Probe that it shared a platform and drivetrain with and there was no comparison. We ended up just keeping our Subaru Loyale AWD turbo because the Mazda wasn’t nice enough to justify the price without AWD.Ford definitely got the better deal with that partnership!
Bill, you have to admit, you are not the prototype for any marketing demographic.I've never owned a car that was not a manual trans. And unlike many of you 'car daters', I'm only interested in long term relationships!
I've only owned seven cars since I was 15. Three of them were lost to the iron oxide god and returned to earth. The other four I still own. Three driven regularly, one resting.
I have had them 46, 31, 30 and 12 years respectively.
Gah, that's horrible! The noise would scare Oscar anyway.Just don't let Oscar near it.
I think that may be the case with every partnership between a US and Japanese brand.
I drove my stepson's diesel truck once. It didn't have a shift pattern on the knob and I drove it a hundred miles or so thinking the revs were pretty high for a diesel before I figured out it had a fifth gear.I'll check in with a note that I got a Subaru Crosstrek with 6-speed manual a couple of months ago and I really like it. It drives a lot better than the 5-speed Subaru Impreza it replaced.
It gets great gas mileage too ... though not during the first week before I remembered to put it in 6th!
Better to know up front. I watched the valet at a wedding stalled my old Impreza as soon as he got into it.