I had, but he retired.It sounds like some of you and/or your family members have not had a PCP who has earned or deserved your trust which is unfortunate.
But even he missed one of my conditions. He did bunch of tests which all came back "normal". It took my own family experience to get myself a referral to the correct specialist, whom did a battery of more tests, one of which came back with the red flag.
I quite doubt my current PCP felt the same way you do. Yes, the only time I see her are during annual physicals. She would discuss the result with me as to what each one means and how to keep them in good range. (if you're over a certain age, your physical won't be 100% perfect. She explains which matters more than others).I would not enjoy just doing routine physicals all day long and just referring any patient with a medical complaint to a specialist and can’t see how that would be satisfying to anyone. PCPs who are referral machines IMHO should reevaluate their career choice.
But if a patient is otherwise healthy, there's nothing to "build a relationship" on. Then, when something happens (cancer anyone?), can your PCP spot it quickly enough to send you to the right specialist? Can you trust your PCP to do so perfectly in every case? Even if he's 99%, won't help you if you're that 1 out of 100!
I like my current PCP in a certain way. She's more of my "health consultant" but she pretend that "I'm the expert and my advice should be taken as gospel". The kind of "trust" some doctors expect.
My Mom worked in a hospital as a patient rep/interpreter. All she saw day in and day out were patients who got delayed/misdiagnosed by their PCP! Occasionally, she saw a few who's sent in by their PCP at the earliest instance. But the ratios were pretty heavily skewed towards the bad side. So yeah, I'm definitely biased on the less trusting side.
Trust, but verify.
Last edited: