How do you propose to move the hips in the right position?
Use The Force, Luke.
How do you propose to move the hips in the right position?
I believe it was @Jilly who mentioned that the Canadians were using the term Grip and it "rang a bell" with me. I have been using it in my teachings and it has gotten a positive response.Insightful post.
You've probably communicated this perspective before when talking about converting straight line travel to circular travel. That frame of reference is too abstract for me to directly connect it to the actual process of skiing. The words you have used above, which focus on grip (a very concrete concept because we all have physically felt it), and mention angulation and speed (also concrete things skiers physically feel) connect much more intuitively than the conversion approach.
I'll continue to try and work on you re the straight to circles concept . Admittedly, it is more effective in a class/clinic environment.
How about Loopy, LoopyI get your concept, @JESinstr, and I do like it, but I prefer the term curvilinear lines to circles, but of course curvilinear is not a common household word, so...
View attachment 195022
Skiing Loopy is good.How about Loopy, Loopy
IMO, skiers need to be able to do this before talking about starting the action with the ankles.
I respectfully acknowledge your perspective. At a certain level, it's a chicken and egg thing and can be approached from either direction. And we can certainly disagree on which comes first.I'll politely disagree. Without developing awareness of foot placement, pressure, rotary movements, tipping, engaging ankles using dorsiflexion, etc... that start at the feet as a precursor, things done higher up in the chain won't be as effective in developing accurate, consistent, and more efficient movements... IMHO and experience of course.
Soooo, I did misinterpret the point you were making LOL. But it did give me the opportunity to bloviate on an Important perspective IMO.@JESinstr We never throw balls in skiing - although I'm sure there is/will be video out there of someone doing just that . We may throw the hips and we definitely "catch" them.
The turn consists of:
1. we catch the hips, with the feet - all of us
2. we deflect the hips - most of us
3. we throw the hips, with the feet - when we decide to do a hop release, in its various forms
The point was that the comparison offered as the reason we should move the hips first, was wrong any way you look at it, as it has no relationship to skiing. When you throw an actual ball with the hand, the feet provide the anchor against which the throwing is done. You cannot move any part of the body, when throwing, before engaging the feet... at least not when throwing sufficiently to have to move the shoulders. Try to do push-ups without uhh using your hands...?
Similar in skiing, weather you release or engage.
Having said that, I did spend an inordinate amount of time following and fine-tuning to ski like the L4s and I do understand why they say that. It is true, that is their sort of default skiing, just like the skiing in the video - "topple" and incline first then "add feet". It's why you see them do only large arcs on SL skis. And then they magically change it suddenly when doing shorts or bumps, which somehow become different techniques although they're the first to tell you that technique doesn't change
In reality though, of course, the feet and legs are engaged and moving, otherwise, the hips got nothing to hop over. It's more a matter of say "focus" or "intensity"... although you're not really moving the hips yourself, you mostly "let them move"... so... words, words, words...
There. Razie's back
Before working, the only A+ I got in college was in kinesiology. I then taught high school physics and university anatomy, coached mostly track and field and soccer but did a lot of mentoring as an environmental professional where I also wrote a lot of mathematical models, and now 5 years of ski instruction. FWIW.Out of curiousity, what's your coaching/teaching background?
Before working, the only A+ I got in college was in kinesiology. I then taught high school physics and university anatomy, coached mostly track and field and soccer but did a lot of mentoring as an environmental professional where I also wrote a lot of mathematical models, and now 5 years of ski instruction. FWIW.
While we may disagree on the optimal sequence for teaching, I don't think we disagree on the relevance/importance of feet in teaching.I do think the more you get into it, the more relevant feet will become in your teaching. Keep us posted.
a skier named Scot Wiseman (on here?).
Played with this today and liked it a lot. Definitely different from the "start with the feet" mantra that I hear so much, not that a focus on the feet isn't always key, but the movements as he describes them start with the core/hips. Thoughts?
We never throw balls in skiing - although I'm sure there is/will be video out there of someone doing just that .