I have a pair of Rossignol E 100s with your name on them then.Stiff,, long, heavy, long turn radius and traditional camber works well for me in crud.
I have a pair of Rossignol E 100s with your name on them then.Stiff,, long, heavy, long turn radius and traditional camber works well for me in crud.
@Josh Matta said it well as usual. On a more general note, I feel like an all mountain daily driver” ski should be a crud ski, becuase this is what we tend to ski with a few rock hard days and powered days mixed in. So, you need decent stiffness, metal or other types of dampening, and a moderate 19-25 m turn radius (in long lengths). A tapered tip design makes a lot of positive difference in crud as well. Again, no surprises that all the highly regarded daily driver skis of the past few years made the list. My personal choice would be either a Kastle FXHP for a versatile design with a mix of power and finesse, or, if you are after a trucking through feeling in a ski that can still pivot, and don’t mind an occasional bumpy ride, a Blizzard Cochise.
Yes, just look at the kids skis as an example. They definitely have smaller radii than adult skis ( race skis included).
I've noticed I generally prefer a short turn radius. Which doesn't really make sense to me, as we've established I'm not much good at letting the ski turn, so I don't know why it would matter.
Yeah, but a long radius ski will be more stable and you will be able to power they clumps of snow.Height defiantly has to do with it. The longer the ski the higher turn radius it will have even in the same tip/waist/tail specs. The longer the radius/length the faster the ski needs to be going to drive it from edge to edge thus making long wide turns. If you Try to make slower short controlled turns on long and fat high radius skis it's hard to really engage the edges. This is what crushes people's knees
My daily ski for Bridger Bowl is a crud ski. I am currently using a Nordica nRGY 107 for that roll but plan to replace it with the Nordica Enforcer 100. The Enforcer has a nice balance and doesn't beat you up in the bumps as badly as some of the skis listed in this thread.
Yeah, but a long radius ski will be more stable and you will be able to power they clumps of snow.
Chances are skier weight hasn't been injected in the calculus.
Solly QST 99, Volkl 90Eight. Fischer Motive 95 (in 180, of course) was a nice blend of crud ski and whippy quick mogul ski.
That said, the best crud ski I tried was a ON3P Billygoat. For 116cm wide, it’s amazingly quick and agile (in shorter lengths, like 179/184) but very stable, and the tail releases nicely in heavy crud.
Chances are skier weight hasn't been injected in the calculus.
Is there a point where one man's crud ski is another man's powder ski? I'm 6'4 245lbs. For example, everyone seems to rave about the Bonafide but would I lose the benefits and the best characteristics at my height and weight to where I need to start looking at the Cochise or something wider and longer?