- Joined
- Dec 19, 2018
- Posts
- 8
From a financial perspective the VR purchase does change a lot. For a PE group there is now a viable exit path.
Someone could buy this, invest $8-10m, sell a ton of passes, get skier numbers up and then flip it to Vail in five years. It's actually the perfect path for PE. The icing on the cake is you can get financing for almost everything on a mountain which boosts the return considerably.
Math would be this:
Purchase for $1m in a bone sale
Upgrades: $10m with $2m in cash up front, rest financed
Invest another $3m to float operations at a $600k loss per year for 5 years
Total invested: $6m cash
Vail purchased the Peak portfolio for $15.5m per resort on an average straight line basis. This is for places in Ohio that are essentially sloped parking lots with snow guns (grew up skiing in Ohio..). Let's say TL is worth $25m in a sale fixed up.
Sell for $25m, pay off $10m in debt, $15m net to seller. If you show a PE firm an investment where they put in $6m and it turns into $15m in five years people will be beating down the door to get in.
Also there is no requirement for profitability, I'm assuming the seller operates at a loss to pad numbers. If they could operate at break-even it's an even more attractive investment.
There aren't many variables here that need to move to make the numbers work really well.
I used to own an investment research business. When I saw the TL water lawsuit I sent a snippet to some PE/hedge fund friends, a few responded right away trying to figure out how to buy the utility out of potentially BK. The math on the resort is more attractive than a utility. I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking about it in these terms.
Someone could buy this, invest $8-10m, sell a ton of passes, get skier numbers up and then flip it to Vail in five years. It's actually the perfect path for PE. The icing on the cake is you can get financing for almost everything on a mountain which boosts the return considerably.
Math would be this:
Purchase for $1m in a bone sale
Upgrades: $10m with $2m in cash up front, rest financed
Invest another $3m to float operations at a $600k loss per year for 5 years
Total invested: $6m cash
Vail purchased the Peak portfolio for $15.5m per resort on an average straight line basis. This is for places in Ohio that are essentially sloped parking lots with snow guns (grew up skiing in Ohio..). Let's say TL is worth $25m in a sale fixed up.
Sell for $25m, pay off $10m in debt, $15m net to seller. If you show a PE firm an investment where they put in $6m and it turns into $15m in five years people will be beating down the door to get in.
Also there is no requirement for profitability, I'm assuming the seller operates at a loss to pad numbers. If they could operate at break-even it's an even more attractive investment.
There aren't many variables here that need to move to make the numbers work really well.
I used to own an investment research business. When I saw the TL water lawsuit I sent a snippet to some PE/hedge fund friends, a few responded right away trying to figure out how to buy the utility out of potentially BK. The math on the resort is more attractive than a utility. I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking about it in these terms.