• For more information on how to avoid pop-up ads and still support SkiTalk click HERE.

Review: Dahu Ecorce 01 120 Ski Boot

Dahu has been around for a while, I recall seeing them at the Copper trade show back in 2015 or so. Even though the current Dahu boot/exo skeleton looks similar to the earlier incarnations, the fit and function are generations better. Since the earlier designs, Dahu has gone through some evolutions to make it work more efficiently while maintaining the unique design.

First of all, this is not another Apex boot. Yes, the design concept does have some similarities (a removable inner boot set inside of an outer frame) but that is where the similarities end. The Apex is a luxury cruiser, like the early generation Lexus ES350 that your Uncle Carl and Aunt Martha had, a comfortable ride but hardly a canyon carver. The Apex is a really nice design and definitely fits a need but there are limitations, such as with skinnier narrow low volume feet and those looking to feel the ski and the snow. The Dahu Ecorce 01C with a 97 mm last is more of a Citroen, unique bordering on contrarian but still drives and handles very well, with a sport sedan panache … The Dahu and Apexes are indeed different tools, so different that if I was still a buyer for a shop and was to stock this type of boot, I would carry both brands.

Dahu is not a plug race boot and will not ski like that, but unlike some of the other alternative offerings, it will not limit 95% of the skiers out there who will be skiing it.

I spent some time at Snowbasin Resort with Dano Bruno, the man in charge with Dahu here in the US. I was fortunate that even with our condensed ski testing schedule, I was able to get out in the Ecorce for a few runs. I was pleasantly surprised with the boot’s performance, and actually impressed with how well the Dahu skied, but I am getting ahead of myself. Let’s start with the inherent design and circle back to the actual on-snow part in a bit.

Dano filled me in on the recent update to the boots and the changes that he brought to the product. While he was telling me all of this, I took the boot apart and examined the design. The sculpturing and the integration of the pieces are very well thought out.

I am always leery when a rep or brand starts the conversation with “There is a process to…” For me, that means something is either very complicated or the design wasn’t thought all the way through and with the Dahu there is a little of both. So, putting the Dahu on does require a bit of a process. I figured that I had two boots to put on, a left and a right, so I said to Dano, “Let me figure one out, then you show me how to do it right.” Surely enough, their process was indeed a bit easier to start with the boot in the frame versus putting the foot in first, then getting into the frame … which will happen from time to time during a ski day. Putting my bootfitter hat on, the question then becomes: How much of the fitting process will the customer retain when they are thinking about this better mousetrap?

dahu_skiboot_1.png
Dahu-skiboot_2.png

The boot should come with a safe word.
Yes, the Dahu has more straps, cables and positional needs than an afternoon at Ms. Samantha’s Dominatrix Dungeon. But again if you are into this type of thing, the results can be rewarding. Once you get into the well-sculptured inner boot, laced all snug and cabled in, you are held in very well. Dano suggested to start with the boot in the Grilamid exoframe before putting your foot in. Once you are in, bring the rear spine up and lock the spine into place. Note that there are different degrees of stance available, ranging from 12-14 degrees. Once you get everything buckled into place, and if you didn’t look down, you would feel like you were in any other ski boot … which is a good thing, right? I think it is.

Yes, the Dahu is indeed a better mousetrap but for a select consumer, one that is looking for a shoe that can be skied in … and quite frankly one that skis very well. The Dahu 120 skied, for the most part like any other 120ish boot out there.

Once you get past the idiosyncrasies of putting them on and getting in and out of the shell when needed, it fits a need. It is a great option in today‘s age of remote parking or in a case when the resort village is also the place where you will be doing a lot of walking or aprè.
  • Who is it for: Those with a narrower foot who have to do a lot of walking.
  • Who is it not for: Racers or those with very athletic legs, higher volume feet or those who need a lot of punches.
  • Insider tip: These do run true to size. The frame is darn close to a traditional boot. My 25.5 frame I tried had a BSL of 302 mm, which is pretty efficient.
  • One thing I would change: Better positioning of the buckles. Right now it is tough to get the right leverage with the middle buckle.
  • Other Review: America's Best Bootfitters, Powered by Masterfit
2/29/23 on snow video...
About author
Philpug
I started skiing in the mid-70s in the Pocono Mountains of Pennsylvania; from then on, I found myself entrenched in the industry. I have worked in various ski shops from suburban to ski town to resort, giving me a well-rounded perspective on what skiers want from their gear. That experience was parlayed into my time as a Gear Review Editor and also consulting with manufacturers as a product tester. Along with being a Masterfit-trained bootfitter I am a fully certified self proclaimed Gear Guru. Not only do I keep up with the cutting edge of ski gear technology, but I am an avid gear collector and have an extensive array of bindings as well as many vintage skis.

Replies

I was surprised the 25.5 sizing was was on. It is definitely a low volume fit.
Hi crew, I am after a bit of fitting advice on these. I have just found (and ordered online) some for my wife who usually skis a 24/24.5 traditional boot. They were a great price online and I have ordered a 24/24.5 and a 25/25.5 with the intention of returning one pair. Obviously can test them on snow and return so need to decide based on trying them on at home. I am pretty knowledgeable on traditional boot fitting but presumably you can’t do a normal shell check with these and I imagine the normal shell space rules don’t apply? So what feel are you after? The normal snug/tight but not crushing? Would you expect toes to brush the end of the inner boot or would you go for more space as per a boot for just walking around in? Any thoughts would be helpful. I am planning at the moment to try for as close a feel to a traditional boot as possible but if you have a different experience that would be good to know. Fingers crossed for a great season!! Cheers all.
 
Hi crew, I am after a bit of fitting advice on these. I have just found (and ordered online) some for my wife who usually skis a 24/24.5 traditional boot. They were a great price online and I have ordered a 24/24.5 and a 25/25.5 with the intention of returning one pair. Obviously can test them on snow and return so need to decide based on trying them on at home. I am pretty knowledgeable on traditional boot fitting but presumably you can’t do a normal shell check with these and I imagine the normal shell space rules don’t apply? So what feel are you after? The normal snug/tight but not crushing? Would you expect toes to brush the end of the inner boot or would you go for more space as per a boot for just walking around in? Any thoughts would be helpful. I am planning at the moment to try for as close a feel to a traditional boot as possible but if you have a different experience that would be good to know. Fingers crossed for a great season!! Cheers all.
Out of curiosity what retailer did you purchase online from with a return policy? My wife suffers from foot pain in her Nordica Promachine boots even after custom footbeds and adjustments by our local shop. Curious about Dahu boots for her but no way to demo them.
 
Out of curiosity what retailer did you purchase online from with a return policy? My wife suffers from foot pain in her Nordica Promachine boots even after custom footbeds and adjustments by our local shop. Curious about Dahu boots for her but no way to demo them.
Sorry, only just seen this … bought from Sport Pursuit (online store) in the UK. They have a return policy but not once worn outside. Are you in the uk?
 
Researching these seems a bit confusing over the course of the last years in terms of the various models and the reviews posted online. From Dahu's web site, it looks like there are three models, the 01, the 01X, and the 01C, which would be their narrow, medium and wide lasts respectively. I had a chance to try on the 01X and found it surprisingly snug for a medium boot. Most of the medium traditional boots on the market are way to wide for my narrow feet (Tecnica & Lange LV's come closest for me). Other than a bit of tightness in the toe box, the boot was very comfortable. I did find the 120 flex to be relatively soft in comparison to my Tecnica's. Very interested to hear your report and see you ski in these boots, Phil. I'm dealing with a lot of neuropathy issues in my feet and find now that I can only stand a few hours in my Tecnica Mach 1's and was considering these might offer me a better chance for some longer ski days. Does anyone know if these boots can be canted? Just wondering beyond my custom footbeds what alignment aids are available.
 
Researching these seems a bit confusing over the course of the last years in terms of the various models and the reviews posted online. From Dahu's web site, it looks like there are three models, the 01, the 01X, and the 01C, which would be their narrow, medium and wide lasts respectively. I had a chance to try on the 01X and found it surprisingly snug for a medium boot. Most of the medium traditional boots on the market are way to wide for my narrow feet (Tecnica & Lange LV's come closest for me). Other than a bit of tightness in the toe box, the boot was very comfortable. I did find the 120 flex to be relatively soft in comparison to my Tecnica's. Very interested to hear your report and see you ski in these boots, Phil. I'm dealing with a lot of neuropathy issues in my feet and find now that I can only stand a few hours in my Tecnica Mach 1's and was considering these might offer me a better chance for some longer ski days. Does anyone know if these boots can be canted? Just wondering beyond my custom footbeds what alignment aids are available.
I stumbled upon this post, looking for advice for my current situation and the pair I just bought used are actually running large to me, counter to everyone else. I've skied two days so far. I wear a size 11.5 wide shoe. I have a 28.5 Dahu 01X 120. It seems to be the perfect width, and maybe a little long. Although it seems too large, almost like a 27.5 would be ideal for me. But the 'looseness' didnt show up till I skied it.

Even with the idosyncracies, I can ski a longer day at speed (in more challenging spring conditions) than my fisher 110 thermofits that are about 10 years old

To try and hold the lower buckle in a more comfortable way, I plan to move the lower buckle looser on the screw adjustment as it seems it may pinch less if it's looser and so i can make it tighter overall and then hold my shin better.

I'll also say that buckling these tighter than you expect seems to make them better. I have mine cranked down and they feel great, other than my heels seems to have too much room. I ski the NY catskills at all levels, and seems pretty good.

The putting on and off isn't bad. I only deal with the tongue and the laces, there's no reason to separate the two. Tighten the lace all the way down, put it in the lace locker, when you pivot the tongue back you loosen the lace holder a tiny bit. Works fine leaving them in the shells.

Tag - regarding the lean, they sell a 2 degree lean kit, mine have that installed, seems to make it feel like a 'traditional' boot position.
 

Article information

Author
Philpug
Views
14,490
Comments
30
Last update

More in Gear

More from Philpug

Top