So stacking up the Divus vs. Camox, even though the Divus are 82 underfoot which makes getting on edge easier (for me anyway), which of those do you think would be better suited for intermediate practicing?
Narrower skis would be better for building skills if your home hill is in Vermont. The climate in Vermont will offer you "firmmmm" groomers for practice. Soft natural snow crud and bumps will be somewhat rare unless you're near Jay Peak.
Narrow is better for putting the skis up on edge on hard snow where part of the ski doesn't sink into the snow. Once up on edge, the skis will bend, and you will want to be able to feel the bending. So skis that will bend, when on edge, at slow to moderate speeds are also helpful. Noodles are not helpful. Skis marketed as "beginner skis" are more often noodles.
Narrower means 78 at the waist - or less. 60something would be really narrow.
No matter what skis you are on, you will need to be willing to go slow on lower pitch terrain while practicing. Learning takes place when there is little perceived terrain challenge, where no caution is needed. Then the mind can concentrate on what you are doing with your feet and legs and arms and so on. In the absence of terrain challenges, you can concentrate on where on the ski you are balancing, how much the tail swishes out compared to the tip, how round your turns are, etc.